IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next Reviews & Product Details - Page 9

The intuitive user interface and the dedication of the sales support team. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Complexity of deployment.and administration. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Global accessibility. Capabilities. Global Configurations. DNG Allows you to manage requirements using best practices while streamlining the working process. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There is not much I dislike about DNG. There is a bit of a learning curve. All of the performance issues experienced with scrollinbg through modules has been corected by the engineers. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

globally accessible requirements management and the built in config management. It is powerful while retaining some of the key features of classic DOORS- like modules Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I believe that some improvement can be made around usability. there is a little bit of a learning curve. when you have a large set of requirements in multiple projects and components Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The new technology on sound functionalities. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Non-seamless migrations from Doors Classic. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like that the application is still being refined. User comments are constantly being implemented to make the tool better. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I am still learning DNG, so there is nothing I dislike at this time. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like th way it links with QM, CCM and DM. The linking between requirements and work items and test cases is extremely beneficial and is the future. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Its completely different then DOORS - this is fine with me but difficult for those who have used DOORS the past 15 years. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

DNG graph generating tool on requirement trace-ability.The perference is on tracability interoperability with the other jazz applications.

like the graph formats, provide some insight into status. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The OLSC API is clunky to use, and the reporting API is too limited to use. Having GCM not configured out of the box leads to a lot of problems. dislike the OLSC because seems to break on upgrades and have to manually re connect, engineers complain Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

DNG provides traceability, integrity and ability to configure the work flow to meet industry standards. It helps to analyze impact analysis effectively and build tight commnunication with stakeholders by giving all project members visibity to requirements. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like layers of requirements and ability to align them to align to architecture elements, ability to manage standard work flow across projects via templates and ability to conduct reviews and having the visibility of requirement progress to all skakeholders. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The system is flexible and offers many ways to accomplish almost everything a user needs to perform. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Best practices when during implementation Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Web based, no install, makes it easier to use Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Difference with Doors classic is sometimes hard Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.