109 Greenlight Guru Clinical Reviews
Overall Review Sentiment for Greenlight Guru Clinical
Log in to view review sentiment.
The best thing about GGC is the e - consent function! It is extremley easy to use and very convenient. The customer support is also fantastic. It was very easy for our team to learn and admapt to this EDC system. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The downsides of GGC are that there are a lot of features that our team could be using but we might just not kow what they are! Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The user friendliness is the top feature of this software Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Log in and patients display page, whereas the individual patient sheet is perfect and ready to use Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Greenlight Guru is very user-friendly. The training sessions and academy are step-by-step and walk the user through every stage of a trial build. Greenlight Guru enables users to query, monitor, and export data very efficiently. Excellent customer support! Our clinical guru has been able to answer and resolve any questions during our form/process build. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Building the forms and process is a huge commitment and requires a great deal of time from the building team. However, once it is built it can be copied for additional clinical trials. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
It is clear and effecient. It is easy and fun to use! I use it with four of my studies and I wish all my studies are in Green Light Guru! I use it everyday to enter data and I haven't even use the customer service as it is straight forward. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The Notification may be grouped into what specific study so it wont be too many. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Setting up GGC is simple, it doesn't require so much time to learn how to build an eCRF for a clinical study.
Customer support is always available if you need help and they always reply quickly. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Protocol deviations. The way of defining and highlighting protocol deviations within each patients is not detailed and leds to some misunderstandings. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The interface and available features to use but definitely it could be better. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
First I would say about is, File Upload is the very traditional way to upload, no view file within the Greenlight Guru Clinical System in case reviewing the Lab Files, and it seems the same feature with File Vault as File Upload except for the upload size plus Greenlight Guru control on access is a bit not user friendly.
Secondly, there is no way for multiple Independent reviewers (Adjudicator) to set up a process separately to access and review files with randomized subjects
Third, Setting up Permission is bit tedious when you have a long list of sites, hard to see which permission or sites I am under to choose. I have to count the column or row or minimize/zoom out the screen to see the access bars Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The cost makes it possible for even small companies to have a database. The forms are easy to design and when there is an issue, the support team is responsive. The systems are compliant yet streamlined, and the fact that it is designed for medical device companies makes it easy to work with. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Requires the sponsor to do the legwork that is normally included for a larger database (hence, the cost savings) Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
It is more straightforward with dedicated modules for med tech studies. A lot of the EDC systems have pharma applications in mind, which just bogs down a platform for med device studies that just don't need those modules. With GGC, it is easy to set up and allows us to utilize those medical device features, making study configuration and data entry easy. When the study configuration and data entry are easy, we have fewer mistakes and queries than when we used other systems! Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
There are some features that would be helpful, especially for some types of studies where the IRB has specific requirements for ICFs. We'd like to see an informed consent process be more like signing a HelloSign document. This way we can just upload the document, place the signature fields (multiple if necessary!), and sign it that way. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
