Conductor Reviews & Product Details

One of the best aspects of Conductor has been the ease of use and user experience. The monitoring platform is really easy to navigate, understand and even gives you shortcuts to the data you want to see. I’ve used software in the past where I could spend hours creating the data I want to see, but the monitoring software does it in minutes. Even with complex insights and multiple data touch points, it manages all of my requests. The new LLM prompt tracking is very powerful and provides necessary insights for us to evaluate how we are doing in the AI space. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There’s not much to dislike! My only suggestion is to delve into the settings to ensure everything is setup correctly so there's no user error. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I really appreciate Conductor's "customer-first" approach. They genuinely care and want to see their customers succeed. One thing that really sets Conductor apart is that they invite customer contributions and have implemented quite a few of my suggested ideas into the platform. It's really rewarding to use the features added from the ideas I have submitted, to see the platform grow and improve, and know you, as a customer, played a role in that. Not too many companies allow you help improve their product like this, which is why it's so awesome that Conductor does that. Please never stop doing this. The plethora of webinars helps me stay updated on SEO trends and learning the product. These webinars are such a huge value add for the customer. Having a dedicated customer success manager for bi-weekly sessions is incredibly helpful. The community section is a great resource for discussing SEO topics with other customers and Conductor employees, ensuring you are talking with credible experts. This provides confidence that you're receiving reliable information. The expansive knowledge base helps customers learn about SEO and different aspects of the platform. I am extremely impressed with the prompt issue resolution and the speed at which bugs are addressed; unless it's something more complex, which is understandable, as those things take longer to fix. The consistent new feature launches combined with informative monthly webinars from the product team, make updates easy to understand. Conductor's support team is the BEST, going above and beyond by not just responding thoroughly but also proactively assisting me, even completing tasks I intended to do myself. Their kindness, friendliness, and professionalism have a huge impact! You can tell they truly care about the customer and delivering an excellent experience. The workspaces tool and keyword research tool significantly improve my efficiency in conducting keyword research and creating reports! What used to take hours now takes 30 minutes to an hour for reporting. With keyword research, weeks. I attended Conductor's C3 conference, and it was an amazing experience. The initial setup of the platform was very easy, even while managing other projects. It took about a month. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Bugs are expected with software, though Conductor does a great job fixing them fast. It might be helpful sometimes to have a video/Zoom call with support to show things live rather than submitting screenshots because sometimes it's easier to show it than explain it. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Conductor has been a major component of our SEO & AEO strategy. We’ve leveraged their writing assistant tool to help generate new, well optimized content at scale. It has helped us reduce the time from ideation to creation to publication by more than half, allowing us to increase the volume of content created by more than 100% year over year.

Workspaces have allowed us to easily gather all relevant data points in an easy to digest report with valuable insight into traditional search performance as well as AEO performance.

I also appreciate their response to customer feedback. The Conductor team has quickly implemented many of the suggestions I’ve made over the years.

Conductor continues to be one of the best SEO & AEO tools on the market and their investment into constantly improving the tool certainly pays off in its functionality. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Navigating the tool can be confusing at times. It's not always obvious to find the data you're looking for. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I really like how the UI is easy to use and very logical, making it simple to find different tools and reports based on how my business approaches reporting and tasks. I also appreciate the recommendations that aren't just based on target keywords but allow for layering on business context. The added business context is incredibly useful as it enables me to monitor not just my website, but other owned web properties including social platforms. It's great that I don't have to set up separate tracking campaigns per domain, which helps me stitch my brand's presence and performance together in a single view. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It's very hard to figure out where to create custom charts. For instance, if I wanted to see a trended week over week report of page 1 KW ranks vs 2-3 specific competitors, that type of customization is not intuitive, we have to ask our Rep to build something for us. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I use Conductor to monitor SEO metrics for my clients and really like having all metrics in one place, so I don't need to use multiple platforms. I really like that you can see AI mentions over time, which helps in improving the content. I like that you can make page groups and keyword groups to track performance over time for implementations. We optimize specific pages on websites, so having those grouped together along with corresponding targeted keywords is helpful. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

For the keyword rankings, it would be helpful to see which pages on the site are earning those specific rankings. The AI citations is a bit open-ended, you have to know exactly what prompts to track when they could be so different from what real people are actually searching. It is a learning curve for sure because there are so many different things that you can use it for that we are still learning. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

At our company, Conductor is the only tool we rely on for SEO and AEO data. Many of us on the SEO team use the tool every day, and the information it shows is used to generate an executive-level report. I also use the Chrome plugin to audit our webpages for SEO compliance and identify opportunities. The UI is fairly easy to understand, but to get the most out of it, you might need some training. I do like the new AI feature to see how we are doing with the AI bots. It does perform in a timely manner for us. So far, the tool is a good value for what we paid for the product. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The only thing I dislike about Conductor is that they demo features and say they will be ready to use soon, only to have us wait several months later to use them. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I am very interested in the Conductor Updates on Anti-AI Text Content Profile and plan to test it thoroughly, as it sounds very appealing and could be a good foundation for new texts. I find the planned expansion of the Writing Assistant, especially new metrics for AI search optimization and potential for a higher Content Score, to be super. I am also interested in the general product enhancements, solving the Canonical problem, and gaining insights from website crawling for our domains. It is great that I have the opportunity to create an annual report and I appreciate that schema definitions are applied automatically. I am glad to see the positive annual results presented by our consultant. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Unfortunately, the content score in the writing assistant still fluctuates significantly within short time intervals, even when no changes are made. Occasionally, excluded questions are still taken into account. This indicates there is still room for improvement. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It's a platform where I can easily create texts that are right for me. At the same time, I have a fantastic overview of my reach and lots of helpful options for expanding my reach in a targeted manner. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I currently lack the ability to create a URL GAP between myself and a competitor. This would support the process of generating reach much better than just at the keyword level. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Keyword tracking and performance overview. The data seems reliable and I can easily access insights to act on or share with my team. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It's not always intuitive, and some edits I want to make are not available where I want to work, e.g. I have to leave a view and go into a keyword to change preferred URL (or maybe it was keyword group).

I also still value "traditional" SEO, but that's being more and more hidden as AI is being pushed. An example: When I want to see an overview of keywordgroups I have to navigate several steps. Performance ->Traditional Search ->More -> Keyword Groups. I know I can have the view in a workspace/dashboard but sometimes I want to see the specific KWG view. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

From an organic search perspective, it’s pretty much everything you’d expect from a system that’s connected to your analytics account and tracks keywords—covering the SEO basics you need and doing a solid job of keeping those fundamentals in one place. The workspaces section is intuitive and the new pages section is great, along with the pages grouping. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

My biggest frustrations are: a) I signed a 2-year agreement right before new features launched, and now I’m stuck on an older pricing structure based on keywords that feels moot. I’ve tried to discuss revising the agreement for the final year, but those conversations haven’t progressed. b) In my initial discussions, I was led to believe I’d have more web tracking capabilities like those in SEMRush, only to find that those features are part of a separate monitoring section/platform that wasn’t included in my original agreement. c) I was sold on the content writing portion of the platform after seeing a LinkedIn video with comparisons, and it really hooked me. But I later found that the content writing score can change even when the content itself hasn’t, which makes it hard to trust the results. d) The AI tracking is tied to credits. For one, it wasn’t available when I signed, so it wasn’t part of my initial agreement. And I’d prefer a flat price to track all AI search (like SEMRush does, which I almost chose and will most likely go back to once my contract is over). Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.