codebeamer Pros and Cons

I liked the DOORs Bridge, which is easy to connect to DOORs legacy and migrate the data.

The best part is the organization of data within the tracker with help of folders and the configuration of tracker data model. It easy to undertstand and implement. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Its about the codebeamer but regarding DOORs bridge. When the tool is configure/uages is to have one tracker at one layer (SW/SYS) then Bridge should also support to configure modules in DOORs to be mapped to folders in a Tracker. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Eeasy to implement, very useful, useful in integration. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

All ok, nothing to dislike inn code beamer. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Review for CodebeamerX:

- High configurability

- Dedicated support; every request is answered in a timely manner, the problem is resolved and every question is answered politely. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Review for CodebeamerX:

- insufficient documentation available (things metioned in documentation does not always work for CodebeamerX)

- bad usability when writing longer text

- lot of manual work when exporting data to Word due to changed sizes of images and tables and additional line breaks

- low performance, long loading times

- not Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

User Interface

Ability to create User / Team / Project specific views

Configurability

Project Templates - Ability to use / distribute organizational best practices Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Reporting functionality is not so capable or sometimes limited only to OOTB fields

No visibility into limitations / known defects of the newly introduced product features Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The best thing is it is web based so it's very fast.

And within a single page you can see all the relevant data of the requirements.

You can send reviews from this app.

You can get timely base mail notification.

It generates version when we did some changes so it will be easy to compare new with old changes and many more Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It's very hard to trace the requirements here.

When you open one requirement you can see only data relevant to that but if I want to jump to another requirement then again I need to go back and search so ultimately traceability is difficult. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One of the best ALM product in the market, The tool provides lot of flexibility in setting up the ALM lifecycle. The tool has features to connect any other application which is a plus and needs very less customisation to set up the ALM Lifecycle Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The Template process is still evolving, We believe this will be addressed in the forthcoming versions. Also Read Write replica could help the next gen architectures Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Tracing the artifacts of a software is today a primary need to respond quickly enough to auditors, to prove the implementation of a regulatory requirement for example as well as its test was a success.

The tool also allows the reuse of projects for better project management. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

When discovering the tool, the GUI seems quite heavy. The tool also allows a lot of personal customizations at all levels which can generate non-uniform projects Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I appreciate

The different views of CB (table view, document view, kanban).

The possibilities to configure the platform especially the review

PnO managed by group Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I don't appreciate :

- at each modification, the version of requirement is increasing.

- all views are not synchronized

- not possible to directly get the Legacy id in the name of requirement for the imported file even with a configuration Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

End to end traceability

Extension and Integration possibilities

PTC support

Continuously evolving and improving Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Some features such as Requirement Re-use are still not strongly integrated Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

codebeamer has putting requirements, testing, development, etc. into one project management, with good traceability and traceability matrix, simple and efficient UI, friendly learning curve, easier approval process Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Some of the underlying logic is a little hard to understand, very fine granularity of permissions configuration and complex configuration logic, Jenkins plugins have not been updated for too long Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.