Show rating breakdown
Save to My Lists
Claimed
Claimed

15 Canonical LXD Reviews

4.4 out of 5
The next elements are filters and will change the displayed results once they are selected.
Search reviews
Popular Mentions
The next elements are radio elements and sort the displayed results by the item selected and will update the results displayed.
Hide FiltersMore Filters
The next elements are filters and will change the displayed results once they are selected.
The next elements are filters and will change the displayed results once they are selected.
15 Canonical LXD Reviews
4.4 out of 5
15 Canonical LXD Reviews
4.4 out of 5

Canonical LXD Pros and Cons

How are these determined?Information
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Pros
Cons

Overall Review Sentiment for Canonical LXDQuestion

Time to Implement
<1 day
>12 months
Return on Investment
<6 months
48+ months
Ease of Setup
0 (Difficult)
10 (Easy)
Log In
Want to see more insights from verified reviewers?
Log in to view review sentiment.
G2 reviews are authentic and verified.
Ahmed S.
AS
Infrastructure Team Lead
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
More Options
Validated Reviewer
Review source: G2 invite
Incentivized Review
What do you like best about Canonical LXD?

The ease of deploying a container in just few simple steps. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Canonical LXD?

There is a problem in Lxd as this software has no pqckage in the apt of debian or ubuntu and you need to install it with snap and this will put layer of file system that you don't need. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Sudhanshu S.
SS
Senior Software Engineer
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
More Options
Validated Reviewer
Review source: G2 invite
Incentivized Review
What do you like best about Canonical LXD?

CoreAPI: which is very scalable, event-based, and has excellent product support.

Backup And Restore: All objects are managed by LXD and using CRUI, we can do live migration. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Canonical LXD?

It cannot be integrated with K8s, Jenkins, public cloud technology stacks. Not very popular like docker, so not too many discussions are available at StackOverflow. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Verified User in Computer Software
AC
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
More Options
Validated Reviewer
Verified Current User
Review source: G2 invite
Incentivized Review
What do you like best about Canonical LXD?

Easy of use, minimal resource requirements Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Canonical LXD?

Lack of an integrated web management view Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Mike B.
MB
C-Level Executive / Platform Architect / Advisor
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
More Options
Validated Reviewer
Review source: G2 invite
Incentivized Review
What do you like best about Canonical LXD?

High performance due to running in LXC (Linux Containers), but for single system installs. Compatible with existing Vagrant box workflow via vagrant-lxd provider (and can be coupled without a cloud provider such as vagrant-digitalocean for a high performance local dev that can match affordable staging and production environments and can even spin them up), or via lxdock (less robust and not well maintained anymore). Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Canonical LXD?

Setup can be difficult to newcomers, Snap version available for non-Ubuntu distros seems to have some issues. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Pablo S.
PS
Owner
Computer & Network Security
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
More Options
Validated Reviewer
Verified Current User
Review source: G2 invite
Incentivized Review
What do you like best about Canonical LXD?

optimization in the use of resources of the server, for the company it is important to be able to take full advantage of a server, without falling into underutilization. It is the software that occupies less resources, very close to the hardware, easy to configure, but it lacks a graphical interface for its administration. In our case we use it with high network availability. I recommend this software 100%, because having powerful servers to offer robust architectures for business is an imperative for any team working within a company.I think that in the near future, the fact of passing a container running from a machine A to a machine B, will be easy to use and quite simple. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Canonical LXD?

sometimes the configurations are a bit complex and it lacks an administration and configuration interface Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.