(0)
0.0 out of 5
Visit Website
Sponsored
Claimed
This profile has been claimed by Canonical LXD, but it has limited features.
Do you work at Canonical LXD? Upgrade your plan to update branding and connect with profile visitors!
Do you work at Canonical LXD? Upgrade your plan to update branding and connect with profile visitors!
Canonical LXD
15 Canonical LXD Reviews
4.4 out of 5
The next elements are filters and will change the displayed results once they are selected.
Hide FiltersMore Filters
The next elements are filters and will change the displayed results once they are selected.
Overall Review Sentiment for Canonical LXD
Time to Implement
<1 day
>12 months
Return on Investment
<6 months
48+ months
Ease of Setup
0 (Difficult)
10 (Easy)
Log In
Want to see more insights from verified reviewers?
Log in to view review sentiment.
Log in to view review sentiment.
G2 reviews are authentic and verified.
Here's how.
We strive to keep our reviews authentic.
G2 reviews are an important part of the buying process, and we understand the value they provide to both our customers and buyers. To ensure the value is retained, it's important to make certain that reviews are authentic and trustworthy, which is why G2 requires verified methods to write a review and validates the reviewer's identity before approving. G2 validates the reviewers identity with our moderation process that prevents inauthentic reviews, and we strive to collect reviews in a responsible and ethical manner.
AS
Ahmed S.
Infrastructure Team Lead
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
What do you like best about Canonical LXD?
The ease of deploying a container in just few simple steps. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
What do you dislike about Canonical LXD?
There is a problem in Lxd as this software has no pqckage in the apt of debian or ubuntu and you need to install it with snap and this will put layer of file system that you don't need. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
SS
Sudhanshu S.
Senior Software Engineer
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
What do you like best about Canonical LXD?
CoreAPI: which is very scalable, event-based, and has excellent product support.
Backup And Restore: All objects are managed by LXD and using CRUI, we can do live migration. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
What do you dislike about Canonical LXD?
It cannot be integrated with K8s, Jenkins, public cloud technology stacks. Not very popular like docker, so not too many discussions are available at StackOverflow. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
AC
Verified User in Computer Software
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
MB
Mike B.
C-Level Executive / Platform Architect / Advisor
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
What do you like best about Canonical LXD?
High performance due to running in LXC (Linux Containers), but for single system installs. Compatible with existing Vagrant box workflow via vagrant-lxd provider (and can be coupled without a cloud provider such as vagrant-digitalocean for a high performance local dev that can match affordable staging and production environments and can even spin them up), or via lxdock (less robust and not well maintained anymore). Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
What do you dislike about Canonical LXD?
Setup can be difficult to newcomers, Snap version available for non-Ubuntu distros seems to have some issues. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
PS
Pablo S.
Owner
Computer & Network Security
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
What do you like best about Canonical LXD?
optimization in the use of resources of the server, for the company it is important to be able to take full advantage of a server, without falling into underutilization. It is the software that occupies less resources, very close to the hardware, easy to configure, but it lacks a graphical interface for its administration. In our case we use it with high network availability. I recommend this software 100%, because having powerful servers to offer robust architectures for business is an imperative for any team working within a company.I think that in the near future, the fact of passing a container running from a machine A to a machine B, will be easy to use and quite simple. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
What do you dislike about Canonical LXD?
sometimes the configurations are a bit complex and it lacks an administration and configuration interface Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Hunting for software insights?
With over 2.5 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
or continue with
Gmail.com addresses not permitted. A business domain using Google is allowed.
By proceeding, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy