- Accueil
- ...
- Outils de test d'automatisation
- Micro Focus UFT One
- Tricentis Tosca
- Micro Focus UFT One-vs-Tricentis Tosca
Comparer OpenText UFT OneetTricentis Tosca 
OpenText UFT One vs Tricentis Tosca
Lors de l'évaluation des deux solutions, les examinateurs ont trouvé que Tricentis Tosca était plus facile à utiliser, à configurer et à administrer. Cependant, les examinateurs ont estimé que les deux fournisseurs facilitent également la conduite des affaires dans l'ensemble.
- Les évaluateurs ont estimé que OpenText UFT One répond mieux aux besoins de leur entreprise que Tricentis Tosca.
- En comparant la qualité du support produit continu, les évaluateurs ont estimé que OpenText UFT One est l'option préférée.
- Pour les mises à jour des fonctionnalités et les feuilles de route, nos évaluateurs ont préféré la direction de Tricentis Tosca à OpenText UFT One.
1)Object repository feature on UFT 2)Imaged based object recognition . 3)Very easy programming language to start automating application. 4)VB script programming used for automation is very user friendly and easy to start with. 5)RO property feature to get...
Not supports parallel execution and it's too heavy coMpared to selenium
Tosca makes automation feasible and scripts created by tosca are easy to maintan. It is easy to understand even for those who have less technical knowledge.
Its complicater to ise and not clearly labled
1)Object repository feature on UFT 2)Imaged based object recognition . 3)Very easy programming language to start automating application. 4)VB script programming used for automation is very user friendly and easy to start with. 5)RO property feature to get...
Tosca makes automation feasible and scripts created by tosca are easy to maintan. It is easy to understand even for those who have less technical knowledge.
Not supports parallel execution and it's too heavy coMpared to selenium
Its complicater to ise and not clearly labled
