Lors de l'évaluation des deux solutions, les examinateurs les ont trouvées tout aussi faciles à utiliser. Cependant, Fraud.net est plus facile à configurer et à utiliser, tandis que Riskified est plus facile à administrer.
I like that I can view most of the information
La configuration de l'URL de rappel du webhook est compliquée. Et le support client est long et lent.
I like the system's speed, so I can make decisions promptly, since there are dozens of situations to review each day. Even the review process is extremely quick, so that I can come back to it after a short time and get a verdict. Riskified also allows me...
Sometimes we get decline that should be an approval but no system is perfect and that can usually be resolved with a discussion with the customer. If the customer doesn't enter into a discussion then it was likely a fraud attempt.
I like that I can view most of the information
I like the system's speed, so I can make decisions promptly, since there are dozens of situations to review each day. Even the review process is extremely quick, so that I can come back to it after a short time and get a verdict. Riskified also allows me...
La configuration de l'URL de rappel du webhook est compliquée. Et le support client est long et lent.
Sometimes we get decline that should be an approval but no system is perfect and that can usually be resolved with a discussion with the customer. If the customer doesn't enter into a discussion then it was likely a fraud attempt.