Lors de l'évaluation des deux solutions, les examinateurs ont trouvé que CockroachDB était plus facile à utiliser, à configurer et à administrer. Cependant, les examinateurs ont préféré faire des affaires avec Fauna dans l'ensemble.
CockroachDB is the only database we could find that had a truly global architecture. CockroachDB speaks PostgreSQL, so it was very easy to integrate with our existing systems.
Encore n'ont pas de soutien respectif en Indonésie.
The scaling options provided by fauna DB for the given pricing are very insightful and cheap compared to other options available in the market with similar features.
Not available on on-premis where still lots of healthcare and insurance companies are having huge clusters on -premis. Perhaps this can be looked into to acquire more customers.
CockroachDB is the only database we could find that had a truly global architecture. CockroachDB speaks PostgreSQL, so it was very easy to integrate with our existing systems.
The scaling options provided by fauna DB for the given pricing are very insightful and cheap compared to other options available in the market with similar features.
Encore n'ont pas de soutien respectif en Indonésie.
Not available on on-premis where still lots of healthcare and insurance companies are having huge clusters on -premis. Perhaps this can be looked into to acquire more customers.