Lors de l'évaluation des deux solutions, les évaluateurs ont trouvé que Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) était plus facile à utiliser et à configurer. Les évaluateurs ont également estimé que Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) était plus facile à utiliser dans l'ensemble. Cependant, les évaluateurs ont estimé que l'administration des deux produits était tout aussi facile.
- I love its features, adaptability of any endpoints, connectivity to the cloud - Azure keeps updating the features of AKS and there are lots of documents and articles if you need to integrate much-needed service - Its easy to use auto-scaling technology...
La solution configure le cluster Kubernetes comme une machine virtuelle. Par conséquent, c'est une infrastructure IaaS et non PaaS.
The user interface of Azure Web Apps is great to create connections for your web application and linking your application with a database. Very intuitive and easy to use.
Resource groups which I think it's not that great when tracking my spending, not that great of a UI, over complexity comparing it to AWS, not owning my provisioned DB and having Azure as the Super user
- I love its features, adaptability of any endpoints, connectivity to the cloud - Azure keeps updating the features of AKS and there are lots of documents and articles if you need to integrate much-needed service - Its easy to use auto-scaling technology...
The user interface of Azure Web Apps is great to create connections for your web application and linking your application with a database. Very intuitive and easy to use.
La solution configure le cluster Kubernetes comme une machine virtuelle. Par conséquent, c'est une infrastructure IaaS et non PaaS.
Resource groups which I think it's not that great when tracking my spending, not that great of a UI, over complexity comparing it to AWS, not owning my provisioned DB and having Azure as the Super user