- Inicio
- ...
- Suites de Software ALM
- codebeamer
- IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next
- codebeamer-vs-IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next
Comparar IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next y codebeamer 
IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next vs codebeamer
Al evaluar las dos soluciones, los revisores encontraron que codebeamer es más fácil de usar, configurar y administrar. También prefirieron hacer negocios con codebeamer en general.
- Los revisores consideraron que codebeamer satisface mejor las necesidades de su empresa que IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next.
- Al comparar la calidad del soporte continuo del producto, los revisores consideraron que codebeamer es la opción preferida.
- En cuanto a actualizaciones de características y hojas de ruta, nuestros revisores prefirieron la dirección de codebeamer sobre IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next.
- Prueba de 45 días sin compromiso y sin tarjeta de crédito
DOORS is easy to understand and work with. This makes it one of the best requirements management tool. DOORS is quick and very effective and best suited for automotive industry
As much as you populate DOORS with artifacts, after a period of time, could be difficult you find what information you are looking for. Depending how the Project Areas are organized in your Company, navegability can be tiring. For example: - When you want...
I must say that what I like best about codebeamer is its comprehensive approach to application lifecycle management. It's great how it covers everything from requirements management to testing and quality assurance, all in one platform. It's also quite...
Lacking user-friendly documentation and unintuitive UI leading to slow adoption rates. Missing key functionalities for Planning and Reporting (e.g. historical data). Unresponsive and limited support with an intransparent organization making it unclear how...
DOORS is easy to understand and work with. This makes it one of the best requirements management tool. DOORS is quick and very effective and best suited for automotive industry
I must say that what I like best about codebeamer is its comprehensive approach to application lifecycle management. It's great how it covers everything from requirements management to testing and quality assurance, all in one platform. It's also quite...
As much as you populate DOORS with artifacts, after a period of time, could be difficult you find what information you are looking for. Depending how the Project Areas are organized in your Company, navegability can be tiring. For example: - When you want...
Lacking user-friendly documentation and unintuitive UI leading to slow adoption rates. Missing key functionalities for Planning and Reporting (e.g. historical data). Unresponsive and limited support with an intransparent organization making it unclear how...
