Al evaluar las dos soluciones, los revisores encontraron que Camms GRC es más fácil de usar, configurar y administrar. Además, prefirieron hacer negocios en general con Camms GRC.
Camms.Risk tiene características útiles, como gráficos para una mejor visión general de los riesgos de cumplimiento pendientes y resueltos. Es una gran herramienta para una mejor organización y seguimiento de riesgos y requisitos.
All of it. Complexity of building reports. Lack of risk management functions. Not user friendly
There are a lot of features that can be utilized. It is mostly user friendly and easy to search and run reports.
Based on my experience using Resolver for the 52-109 program, I find that Resolver is limited in some ways. Some of the basic features that are typically available in a GRC tool are not there (E.g. Project Management Dashboard, Automated sub-certification...
Camms.Risk tiene características útiles, como gráficos para una mejor visión general de los riesgos de cumplimiento pendientes y resueltos. Es una gran herramienta para una mejor organización y seguimiento de riesgos y requisitos.
There are a lot of features that can be utilized. It is mostly user friendly and easy to search and run reports.
All of it. Complexity of building reports. Lack of risk management functions. Not user friendly
Based on my experience using Resolver for the 52-109 program, I find that Resolver is limited in some ways. Some of the basic features that are typically available in a GRC tool are not there (E.g. Project Management Dashboard, Automated sub-certification...