Al evaluar las dos soluciones, los revisores encontraron que CoConstruct es más fácil de usar, configurar y administrar. También prefirieron hacer negocios con CoConstruct en general.
I like that all areas of the construction team can use the software - the guys in the field, the project managers, the design team, the subcontractors and even the accounting team. It summarizes data well.
Navigation is counter-intuitive and redundant. Several unnecessary options you have to click thru to do basic tasks. Needs to combine Files and Photos uploads into one directory.
La capacidad de gestionar múltiples proyectos y organizar comunicaciones todo en un solo lugar.
The estimating tool is very clunky. It doesn't allow you to load all the various estimates received from subs into the system and choose which options to select and automatically update the budget. That is challenging when considering different approaches...
I like that all areas of the construction team can use the software - the guys in the field, the project managers, the design team, the subcontractors and even the accounting team. It summarizes data well.
La capacidad de gestionar múltiples proyectos y organizar comunicaciones todo en un solo lugar.
Navigation is counter-intuitive and redundant. Several unnecessary options you have to click thru to do basic tasks. Needs to combine Files and Photos uploads into one directory.
The estimating tool is very clunky. It doesn't allow you to load all the various estimates received from subs into the system and choose which options to select and automatically update the budget. That is challenging when considering different approaches...