Comparar AMS360 y QQCatalyst 
AMS360 vs QQCatalyst
Al evaluar las dos soluciones, los revisores encontraron que QQCatalyst es más fácil de usar, configurar y administrar. Sin embargo, sintieron que ambos proveedores facilitan igualmente hacer negocios en general.
- Los revisores consideraron que AMS360 satisface mejor las necesidades de su empresa que QQCatalyst.
- Al comparar la calidad del soporte continuo del producto, los revisores consideraron que AMS360 es la opción preferida.
- En cuanto a actualizaciones de características y hojas de ruta, nuestros revisores prefirieron la dirección de QQCatalyst sobre AMS360.
Very user friendly and good for the work I do, especially from claims point of view.
For Accounting use, AMS does not have the detailed functionality to provide cash on account reporting that can associate income received with statement reconciliations. Not having this feature requires offline tracking which creates a greater risk for...
It includes all the functions that I expect.
I always struggle logging in in the morning. Sometimes the system has me enter my email and password close to five times before it will accept that I am not a robot and let me into my account. One of my work associates also has this problem, while my other...
Very user friendly and good for the work I do, especially from claims point of view.
It includes all the functions that I expect.
For Accounting use, AMS does not have the detailed functionality to provide cash on account reporting that can associate income received with statement reconciliations. Not having this feature requires offline tracking which creates a greater risk for...
I always struggle logging in in the morning. Sometimes the system has me enter my email and password close to five times before it will accept that I am not a robot and let me into my account. One of my work associates also has this problem, while my other...
