Recursos de Herramientas de Arquitectura Empresarial
Haz clic en Términos del Glosario, Discusiones, y Informes para ampliar tus conocimientos sobre Herramientas de Arquitectura Empresarial
Las páginas de recursos están diseñadas para brindarle una visión general de la información que tenemos sobre categorías específicas. Encontrará definiciones de funciones, discusiones de usuarios como usted, y informes de datos de la industria.
Términos del Glosario de Herramientas de Arquitectura Empresarial
Explora nuestro glosario de tecnología
Explore docenas de términos para comprender mejor los productos que compra y usa a diario.
Discusiones de Herramientas de Arquitectura Empresarial
I inherited the administration of an Enterprise Architecture solution on iServer. The TOGAF framework is familiar to me and I understand how iServer attempts to enforce those steps to be followed. But most of my business analysis group is interested in using iServer as a modeling tool and exploring its capabilities without understanding or following TOGAF. I'd like to know from someone's experience using the Enterprise Business Process Analysis solution whether there is a similar limitation in following some other framework or are all templates available to all users within any folder? Also, has anyone encountered the issue of 'ghost' relationships appearing in entity-relationship diagrams? How to prevent that?
How do you integrate it with web projects running on js?
What we're looking for is the ability to have multiple teams work on the enterprise architecture models but only one team is responsible for one section of the model. (So only the PeopleSoft teams touch the PeopleSoft area. But they can see what the Hyperion teams are doing, just not change it.)