Compare Windows Movie Maker and Wondershare Filmora 
- Users report that Wondershare Filmora excels in its Clip Editing feature, scoring 9.1, which allows for precise adjustments and seamless transitions, while Windows Movie Maker, with a score of 8.7, offers basic editing capabilities that may not satisfy more advanced users.
- Reviewers mention that the Quality of Support for Wondershare Filmora is rated at 8.5, indicating a more responsive and helpful support team compared to Windows Movie Maker's lower score of 7.5, which users feel could lead to longer wait times for assistance.
- G2 users highlight the superior Text Animation capabilities of Wondershare Filmora, scoring 8.6, which provides a variety of dynamic text effects, whereas Windows Movie Maker, with a score of 8.3, offers limited options that may not meet the needs of users looking for more creative text presentations.
- Users on G2 report that Wondershare Filmora's Audio Mixing feature, rated at 8.6, allows for more detailed sound editing, while Windows Movie Maker's score of 8.7 suggests it has a slightly better user experience in this area, but lacks advanced features that Filmora provides.
- Reviewers say that Wondershare Filmora's Product Direction is rated at 8.4, indicating a strong commitment to continuous improvement and feature updates, while Windows Movie Maker's score of 5.2 raises concerns about its future development and support.
- Users report that Wondershare Filmora's Format Compatibility is rated at 8.9, allowing for a wider range of file types and export options, while Windows Movie Maker, with a score of 8.2, may limit users who need to work with diverse media formats.
- One Filmora 2024 Annual Subscription
- Compatible with Windows and MacOS
- Access to 22+ language versions of Filmora
Simplicity, ease-of-use and essentially zero-cost are the features I most enjoy. As most of the computers in the company run Windows, it makes sharing much easier than having to make different videos to suit different platforms, This saves me time as well...
Simplicity is a double edged sword. While Movie Maker makes it easy for the average user to operate it lacks in real production abilities. If you are looking at splitting audio and splicing with real ease, movie maker is not the right option.
It makes everything really easy. everything is available for you. There are also lots of templates that gives you new ideas and make your work more creative. The process of editing is also easy. You start with basics and in each field you can add different...
Trying to do anything other than basic editing quickly becomes time-consuming and frustrating. Just some of the issues include the interface is too small to do animation or accurate keyframing; the file size is always way more significant than what it says...
Simplicity, ease-of-use and essentially zero-cost are the features I most enjoy. As most of the computers in the company run Windows, it makes sharing much easier than having to make different videos to suit different platforms, This saves me time as well...
It makes everything really easy. everything is available for you. There are also lots of templates that gives you new ideas and make your work more creative. The process of editing is also easy. You start with basics and in each field you can add different...
Simplicity is a double edged sword. While Movie Maker makes it easy for the average user to operate it lacks in real production abilities. If you are looking at splitting audio and splicing with real ease, movie maker is not the right option.
Trying to do anything other than basic editing quickly becomes time-consuming and frustrating. Just some of the issues include the interface is too small to do animation or accurate keyframing; the file size is always way more significant than what it says...
