Compare TestRail and Zephyr Enterprise 
- Users report that TestRail excels in its user-friendly interface, with an Ease of Use score of 8.6, making it easier for teams to adopt and integrate into their workflows compared to Zephyr Enterprise, which has a lower score of 7.8.
- Reviewers mention that TestRail's Test Repository feature is highly rated at 8.9, allowing for efficient organization and management of test cases, while Zephyr Enterprise's similar functionality scores slightly lower at 8.8.
- G2 users highlight that TestRail's reporting capabilities, with a score of 8.3, provide clear insights into testing progress, although Zephyr Enterprise outshines in this area with a higher score of 9.2, indicating more robust reporting features.
- Users on G2 report that TestRail offers better customization options, which is crucial for teams needing tailored solutions, while Zephyr Enterprise's customization features are perceived as less flexible.
- Reviewers mention that TestRail's integration capabilities score 7.9, which some users find limiting compared to Zephyr Enterprise's higher score of 8.3, indicating a broader range of integrations with other tools.
- Users say that TestRail has a strong focus on test diversity, scoring 8.6, which is essential for teams working with various testing methodologies, while Zephyr Enterprise scores slightly higher at 8.9, showcasing its versatility in handling different testing types.
- No IT required, get started in minutes
- Automated updates & optimizations
- Secure hosting on super-fast servers
I am experienced in a number of test management tools including HP ALM/Quality Center, IBM's Rational ClearQuest, SmartBear's QA Complete, among others. I am now one of the owners of a small professional services group, and I have management...
I don't like that once you close a ticket in Jira the status of the ticket reads closed in TestRail, yet Testrail still shows that issue as either needing to have a test run on it to pass or fail. If its closed its closed, and no longer needs tests to run.
You can Link your defects to Stories. You can Link your defects to Task. You can Link your defects to Requirements. It is really easy to Create Test Cases, Update those test cases, and Cloning those test cases. You can easily Planning the Test Cycle...
Some of the organization is non-intuitive and buggy. I also think that it could be more user-friendly, perhaps with some pre-made templated test cases (titles giving hints on what to test and possible priorities)
I am experienced in a number of test management tools including HP ALM/Quality Center, IBM's Rational ClearQuest, SmartBear's QA Complete, among others. I am now one of the owners of a small professional services group, and I have management...
You can Link your defects to Stories. You can Link your defects to Task. You can Link your defects to Requirements. It is really easy to Create Test Cases, Update those test cases, and Cloning those test cases. You can easily Planning the Test Cycle...
I don't like that once you close a ticket in Jira the status of the ticket reads closed in TestRail, yet Testrail still shows that issue as either needing to have a test run on it to pass or fail. If its closed its closed, and no longer needs tests to run.
Some of the organization is non-intuitive and buggy. I also think that it could be more user-friendly, perhaps with some pre-made templated test cases (titles giving hints on what to test and possible priorities)
