Compare TestRail and Tricentis qTest 
- Users report that Tricentis qTest excels in its Test Feedback feature, achieving a score of 9.2, which reviewers mention provides comprehensive insights into test results and facilitates better decision-making.
- Reviewers mention that TestRail shines in its Test Diversity functionality, scoring 8.6, allowing teams to manage various types of tests effectively, which is crucial for comprehensive testing strategies.
- G2 users highlight that Tricentis qTest's Organization feature is particularly strong, with a score of 9.3, making it easier for teams to structure their testing efforts and maintain clarity in test management.
- Users on G2 report that TestRail's Reporting capabilities score 8.3, providing detailed analytics and insights that help teams track progress and identify areas for improvement, which is essential for project management.
- Reviewers mention that Tricentis qTest's Integration score of 8.1 is beneficial for teams looking to connect with various tools, although some users feel it could be improved compared to TestRail's integration capabilities.
- Users say that both products have strong Test Repository features, each scoring 8.9, but Tricentis qTest is noted for its user-friendly interface that simplifies test case management, making it a preferred choice for some teams.
- No IT required, get started in minutes
- Automated updates & optimizations
- Secure hosting on super-fast servers
I am experienced in a number of test management tools including HP ALM/Quality Center, IBM's Rational ClearQuest, SmartBear's QA Complete, among others. I am now one of the owners of a small professional services group, and I have management...
I don't like that once you close a ticket in Jira the status of the ticket reads closed in TestRail, yet Testrail still shows that issue as either needing to have a test run on it to pass or fail. If its closed its closed, and no longer needs tests to run.
The API allows us to be flexible in our testing strategy. We are able to easily aggregate results from several different sources to give a complete testing picture. This tool seems to have taken a more forward thinking approach vs other tools we evaluated...
Overall support for automated tests is not great: We need to be able to easily integrate with any open source testing framework and it's more code than expected
I am experienced in a number of test management tools including HP ALM/Quality Center, IBM's Rational ClearQuest, SmartBear's QA Complete, among others. I am now one of the owners of a small professional services group, and I have management...
The API allows us to be flexible in our testing strategy. We are able to easily aggregate results from several different sources to give a complete testing picture. This tool seems to have taken a more forward thinking approach vs other tools we evaluated...
I don't like that once you close a ticket in Jira the status of the ticket reads closed in TestRail, yet Testrail still shows that issue as either needing to have a test run on it to pass or fail. If its closed its closed, and no longer needs tests to run.
Overall support for automated tests is not great: We need to be able to easily integrate with any open source testing framework and it's more code than expected
