Compare Surfer and cognitiveSEO 
- Users report that cognitiveSEO excels in SEO Auditing with a score of 9.1, highlighting its comprehensive SEO Auditing & Monitoring tools, while Surfer, with a score of 7.6 in SEO Alerting, is seen as less robust in this area.
- Reviewers mention that Surfer shines in Ease of Use and Setup, scoring 9.3 and 9.4 respectively, making it more user-friendly for beginners compared to cognitiveSEO, which scored 8.1 and 8.7 in these categories.
- G2 users note that cognitiveSEO's Content Creation Tools received a score of 7.9, which some find lacking compared to Surfer's more advanced content optimization features, particularly in keyword research where Surfer scored 8.5.
- Users on G2 highlight that cognitiveSEO's Link Building feature scored 8.7, making it a strong choice for users focused on building backlinks, whereas Surfer's Link Building scored only 7.0, indicating a gap in functionality.
- Reviewers say that Surfer's audience targeting capabilities are impressive, with a score of 8.9, while cognitiveSEO's audience insights scored lower at 8.3, suggesting Surfer provides better tools for reaching specific demographics.
- Users report that cognitiveSEO's Quality of Support is rated at 8.9, which is commendable, but Surfer outperforms with a score of 9.4, indicating a more responsive and helpful support system for users needing assistance.
- Track 200 pages across your sites
- Write & optimize 30 articles / month
- Generate 5 ready-to-rank articles / month
- Campaigns: 3
- OnPage Audit: 50,000
- Inbound Link Analysis: 200,00
Its content editor is what I have been looking for a so long. All of the content planning I was doing manually. It has saved me lots of time.
Surfer AI has gotten worse to the point that the tool is unusable. Think: the lamest, most generic phrases of GPT-4 strung together. Readers will instantly detect an article written by Surfer AI. It's not worth pasting research into the 'additional content'...
Integration and analysis of the data from other sources - key selling point in CognitiveSEO for me is how visual is the data and how you can go from diagrams/trees/charts to raw data. Disavow generator is really nice, competition comparison too. Also...
Tool promises do run audit for JavaScript based websites but the audit report is full of wrong results. Their team acknowledges the errors but then they don’t even fix the same. Tool design is not user friendly and intact they don’t even allow you...
Its content editor is what I have been looking for a so long. All of the content planning I was doing manually. It has saved me lots of time.
Integration and analysis of the data from other sources - key selling point in CognitiveSEO for me is how visual is the data and how you can go from diagrams/trees/charts to raw data. Disavow generator is really nice, competition comparison too. Also...
Surfer AI has gotten worse to the point that the tool is unusable. Think: the lamest, most generic phrases of GPT-4 strung together. Readers will instantly detect an article written by Surfer AI. It's not worth pasting research into the 'additional content'...
Tool promises do run audit for JavaScript based websites but the audit report is full of wrong results. Their team acknowledges the errors but then they don’t even fix the same. Tool design is not user friendly and intact they don’t even allow you...
