- Home
- ...
- Endpoint Protection Suites
- Sophos Intercept X: Next-Gen Endpoint
- ThreatLocker
- Sophos Intercept X: Next-Gen Endpoint-vs-ThreatLocker
Compare Sophos Intercept X: Next-Gen Endpoint and ThreatLocker 
- Users report that Sophos Intercept X excels in its Malware Detection capabilities, scoring 9.7, which reviewers mention provides a robust defense against various threats. In contrast, ThreatLocker, while still effective, scores lower at 8.8, indicating it may not be as comprehensive in this area.
- Reviewers mention that Sophos Intercept X offers superior Quality of Support with a score of 8.7, highlighting responsive and helpful customer service. ThreatLocker, however, shines with a remarkable score of 9.8, suggesting that users find their support to be exceptionally reliable and effective.
- G2 users note that Sophos Intercept X has a strong focus on Real-Time Detection, scoring 9.6, which is crucial for immediate threat response. ThreatLocker, while effective, scores slightly lower at 9.0, indicating a potential delay in threat identification.
- Users on G2 report that Sophos Intercept X's Ease of Use is rated at 9.2, making it user-friendly for organizations of various sizes. In contrast, ThreatLocker scores 8.5, suggesting that some users may find it less intuitive to navigate.
- Reviewers mention that Sophos Intercept X's Application Control feature is highly rated at 9.8, allowing for effective management of applications on endpoints. ThreatLocker also performs well in this area with a score of 9.6, but users indicate that Sophos provides more comprehensive control options.
- Users say that Sophos Intercept X's Proactive Threat Hunting capabilities, rated at 9.2, are a standout feature, enabling organizations to stay ahead of potential threats. ThreatLocker, while offering similar features, scores lower at 8.4, suggesting it may not be as proactive in threat detection.
- Ringfencing™
- Allowlisting
- Storage Control
I like how easy it is to configure and manage, as well as how well it works. I have had extremely good luck with it, and i have used it since it was in beta form. I have looked at other offerings, but keep sticking with Sophos, which must mean something.
Pretty much everything about uninstalling the existing EndPoint client and installing the new Sophos Central client. Even with an automated install, allow for at least 30 minutes per machine (and that's if everything goes right). Often it doesn't go...
I have told our representative this many times: Threatlocker needs to hold seminars on how to run a company with ensuing support. There are essentially 3 things, but they are HUGE and encompass 100% of the product. As a daily user of the product, the...
The thing about ThreatLocker is the admin has to know what they're doing. If they don't it can be a major pain in the thorn for your team. So ask yourself, does my admin know what they're doing? If they don't, I would look for a more admin friendly platform.
I like how easy it is to configure and manage, as well as how well it works. I have had extremely good luck with it, and i have used it since it was in beta form. I have looked at other offerings, but keep sticking with Sophos, which must mean something.
I have told our representative this many times: Threatlocker needs to hold seminars on how to run a company with ensuing support. There are essentially 3 things, but they are HUGE and encompass 100% of the product. As a daily user of the product, the...
Pretty much everything about uninstalling the existing EndPoint client and installing the new Sophos Central client. Even with an automated install, allow for at least 30 minutes per machine (and that's if everything goes right). Often it doesn't go...
The thing about ThreatLocker is the admin has to know what they're doing. If they don't it can be a major pain in the thorn for your team. So ask yourself, does my admin know what they're doing? If they don't, I would look for a more admin friendly platform.
