Compare SAP Enterprise Portfolio and Project Management and UpKeep 
- Users report that UpKeep excels in ease of use with a score of 9.0, making it accessible for teams without extensive training. In contrast, SAP Enterprise Portfolio and Project Management has a lower ease of use score of 6.7, which reviewers mention can lead to a steeper learning curve.
- Reviewers mention that UpKeep's quality of support is highly rated at 9.0, with many users appreciating the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team. Conversely, SAP's support is rated lower at 7.6, with some users expressing frustration over slower response times.
- G2 users highlight UpKeep's strong asset tracking capabilities, particularly in location and status tracking, both scoring 8.8 and 8.9 respectively. Users on G2 note that SAP's asset tracking features, while functional, do not match the intuitive design and effectiveness of UpKeep's offerings.
- Users say that UpKeep's work order management feature is robust, scoring 9.2, which allows for efficient handling of maintenance tasks. In comparison, SAP's work order management is perceived as less user-friendly, leading to some inefficiencies in task execution.
- Reviewers mention that UpKeep's predictive maintenance capabilities, rated at 8.1, provide valuable insights that help prevent equipment failures. Users report that SAP's predictive maintenance features are less comprehensive, with a score of 8.3, leading to missed opportunities for proactive maintenance.
- Users report that UpKeep's integration capabilities with ERP systems score 7.8, which is sufficient for most mid-market needs. However, reviewers mention that SAP's integration options, while more extensive, can be complex and may require additional resources to implement effectively.
- Unlimited work orders
- Schedule Preventative Maintenance
- Custom tasks
In my experience, I find several aspects of SAP EAM valuable. The software's comprehensive asset management capabilities allow me to track and optimize asset performance effectively. I appreciate the preventive maintenance features, which help reduce...
Everything is very manual and involves multiple screens to process one transaction. It is not user friendly for our hourly employees when entering in time. The software is not US based and can be challenging to learn.
Provides updates on new features and how to organize your work. It keeps you up to speed when a work order is due and if past due. It gives you options when setting due dates and assigning others to a task Support is always available, and if its past...
Where do I start. I can't change work order repeating days. The work orders that do have repeating days, do not show up on the dates they are due. I have to buy the business plan in order to use a calendar day view. There are numerous bugs and glitches with...
In my experience, I find several aspects of SAP EAM valuable. The software's comprehensive asset management capabilities allow me to track and optimize asset performance effectively. I appreciate the preventive maintenance features, which help reduce...
Provides updates on new features and how to organize your work. It keeps you up to speed when a work order is due and if past due. It gives you options when setting due dates and assigning others to a task Support is always available, and if its past...
Everything is very manual and involves multiple screens to process one transaction. It is not user friendly for our hourly employees when entering in time. The software is not US based and can be challenging to learn.
Where do I start. I can't change work order repeating days. The work orders that do have repeating days, do not show up on the dates they are due. I have to buy the business plan in order to use a calendar day view. There are numerous bugs and glitches with...
