
There are so many things I appreciate about MaintainX, from how easy it is to integrate and deploy to the level of customer service and ongoing engagement. It’s also very user-friendly for both requesters and full users. We’ve captured a lot of valuable data and produced reliable reporting, which has helped us reduce unplanned downtime on critical assets by 90%—a huge feat in most industries. We’ve also started our journey into predictive maintenance with sensor technology, and the MaintainX vibration team was able to warn us about a catastrophic failure before it happened (as verified by our senior maintenance mechanic). Compared with the L2L and Maximo platforms, the pricing feels fair, and leadership can see the ROI immediately across the board. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Some parts of the reporting still need tweaking for me, particularly the ability to compile all data into a single Excel report. From time to time, new features roll out—or changes are made to existing features and reporting—without our knowledge, and we end up having to contact our customer reps just to figure out what’s different.
Another issue is visibility: full users can see all open work orders, but requesters can’t. That gap can easily lead to duplicate work orders being submitted. It would be helpful if requesters were prompted to check whether a similar request already exists before submitting a new one. I’d also like a notification icon within the app itself, similar to the alarm bell in Outlook. Finally, it would be great to have a way to link related work orders together for easier troubleshooting, and I understand this is a feature within the new MaintainX Copilot. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.






