Compare RoadEng Civil Engineer and Site3D 
- Users report that RoadEng Civil Engineer excels in Earthwork design, achieving a perfect score of 10.0, which reviewers mention is particularly beneficial for projects requiring precise earthwork calculations.
- Reviewers mention that Site3D shines in 3D Rendering with a score of 9.2, highlighting its ability to create visually appealing and realistic models, which enhances presentations and client communications.
- G2 users indicate that RoadEng Civil Engineer has superior Quality of Support, scoring 9.5, with many users praising the responsiveness and expertise of the support team, making it easier to resolve issues quickly.
- Users on G2 report that Site3D offers a more user-friendly experience with an Ease of Use score of 9.2, which reviewers say makes it easier for new users to get started without extensive training.
- Reviewers mention that RoadEng Civil Engineer has a strong focus on Transportation engineering, scoring 9.7, which users say is crucial for projects that involve complex transportation infrastructure.
- Users say that Site3D's collaboration features, while scoring 8.8, could be improved, as some reviewers express a desire for more robust tools to facilitate teamwork on large projects.
- Includes 3 months of access to unlimited technical support and product updates
The best features of RoadEng are it's ability to handle large amounts of survey data and the speed that you can take a concept to a finished design. We tend to deal with large amounts of LiDAR data. Civil3D has implemented point clouds and they work OK...
The file compatibility with other third party packages. At times an issue but doesn’t hinder the usefulness
Site3D is easy to get to grips with, versatile and very forgiving if revisions are required to the model. The ability to view changes in output data, such as longitudinal sections and manhole schedules without having to manually regenerate them means that...
It would b nice if it accepted more file types. We typically use DWG files and they need to be converted using another piece of software before they can be uploaded to Site 3D.
The best features of RoadEng are it's ability to handle large amounts of survey data and the speed that you can take a concept to a finished design. We tend to deal with large amounts of LiDAR data. Civil3D has implemented point clouds and they work OK...
Site3D is easy to get to grips with, versatile and very forgiving if revisions are required to the model. The ability to view changes in output data, such as longitudinal sections and manhole schedules without having to manually regenerate them means that...
The file compatibility with other third party packages. At times an issue but doesn’t hinder the usefulness
It would b nice if it accepted more file types. We typically use DWG files and they need to be converted using another piece of software before they can be uploaded to Site 3D.
