Compare QEMU and Vagrant 
QEMU vs Vagrant
- Reviewers felt that Vagrant meets the needs of their business better than QEMU.
- When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that Vagrant is the preferred option.
- For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of Vagrant over QEMU.
1. QEMU is good at device emulation and has various platforms which is perfect for development or testing on different platforms. 2. QEMU's documentation is quite helpful and it is easy to use with just few lines of command lines. 3. With KVM, QEMU is so...
Doesn't work out of the box. Too many magic configuration options. I'm looking for a finished product, not the insides of an engine.
1. The major reason why I'd use vagrant is to make sure that my development machine is almost 1-to-1 with the deployment server (hardware spec is basically too difficult to replicate in-office) this would solve issues between going from Apple's BSD to say a...
In the last 2 years, I moved from Vagrant to Docker because the Docker ecosystem seems to have more adoption and there are more resources. Vagrant seems to have been frozen in time.
1. QEMU is good at device emulation and has various platforms which is perfect for development or testing on different platforms. 2. QEMU's documentation is quite helpful and it is easy to use with just few lines of command lines. 3. With KVM, QEMU is so...
1. The major reason why I'd use vagrant is to make sure that my development machine is almost 1-to-1 with the deployment server (hardware spec is basically too difficult to replicate in-office) this would solve issues between going from Apple's BSD to say a...
Doesn't work out of the box. Too many magic configuration options. I'm looking for a finished product, not the insides of an engine.
In the last 2 years, I moved from Vagrant to Docker because the Docker ecosystem seems to have more adoption and there are more resources. Vagrant seems to have been frozen in time.
