Compare Progress Telerik and python wiki 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (47.1% of reviews)
Small-Business (38.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Starting at $849.00 Per Year
No pricing available
Progress Telerik
Star Rating
(96)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (47.1% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Starting at $849.00 Per Year
Free Trial is available
Browse all 4 pricing planspython wiki
Star Rating
(14)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (38.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about python wikiSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Progress Telerik excels in its Component Library, scoring 9.2, which reviewers mention provides a wide range of pre-built UI components that enhance development speed and efficiency. In contrast, Python Wiki's Component Library received a higher score of 9.6, indicating a more extensive selection of components that users find beneficial for various applications.
- Reviewers mention that Progress Telerik's ease of use is rated at 8.2, which some users find slightly challenging for beginners. However, Python Wiki shines with a higher ease of use score of 9.2, with users stating that its intuitive interface makes it accessible for developers of all skill levels.
- G2 users highlight that Progress Telerik's Quality of Support is rated at 8.7, with many reviewers appreciating the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team. Conversely, Python Wiki has a slightly better score of 9.1, with users reporting that the community support and documentation are particularly strong, making it easier to find solutions to common issues.
- Users on G2 report that Progress Telerik's Framework Integration is rated at 8.7, which some users find adequate for their needs. However, Python Wiki outperforms with a score of 9.2, with reviewers mentioning that it seamlessly integrates with various frameworks, enhancing its versatility in different development environments.
- Reviewers say that Progress Telerik's Data Security is rated at 7.8, which some users feel could be improved, especially for sensitive applications. In contrast, Python Wiki's Data Synchronization received a higher score of 8.2, with users noting that it offers robust security features that are crucial for data-sensitive projects.
- Users report that Progress Telerik's Application Templates score 8.6, which many find useful for kickstarting projects. However, Python Wiki's Straight-Out-the-Box Functionality scored 8.3, with reviewers mentioning that while it is functional, it may require additional customization to meet specific project needs.
Featured Products
Sponsored
Intellimas
(0)
Low-Code Development Platforms
Visit Website
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Progress Telerik
Individual .NET Libraries
Starting at $849.00
Per Year
Telerik UI for Blazor, Telerik UI for ASP.NET MVC, Telerik UI for ASP.NET Core, Telerik UI for .NET MAUI, Telerik UI for ASP.NET MVC, Telerik UI for ASP.NET Core, Telerik UI for WPF, Telerik UI for WinForms.
- Truly native UI components to cover any app scenario
- Telerik UI Kits for Figma
- Document processing libraries
python wiki
No pricing availableFree Trial
Progress Telerik
Free Trial is available
python wiki
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.8
58
9.3
10
Ease of Use
8.2
60
9.2
10
Ease of Setup
8.6
30
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
8.9
22
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.7
58
9.1
9
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.9
25
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
8.1
56
8.8
10
Features by Category
Functionality
8.7
19
8.1
8
9.2
22
9.6
8
8.6
18
8.1
8
Management
8.7
21
9.2
8
7.9
17
9.3
7
8.6
22
8.5
8
Data Sources
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Delivery
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
7.5
20
Not enough data
7.7
16
Not enough data
7.4
18
Not enough data
7.3
20
Not enough data
8.3
20
Not enough data
7.3
20
Not enough data
8.0
19
Not enough data
Application Design
8.8
12
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.8
11
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.7
10
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.6
12
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.5
10
|
Verified
Not enough data
Data Control
7.7
10
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.2
10
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.8
9
|
Verified
Not enough data
Publishing
8.3
10
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.5
11
Not enough data
8.0
11
|
Verified
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Progress Telerik and python wiki are categorized as Component Libraries
Unique Categories
Progress Telerik is categorized as Application Development Platforms, Low-Code Development Platforms, and Document Generation
python wiki has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Progress Telerik
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
python wiki
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
19.8%
Information Technology and Services
16.3%
Insurance
4.7%
Financial Services
4.7%
Automotive
4.7%
Other
50.0%
Internet
15.4%
Information Technology and Services
15.4%
Consulting
7.7%
Writing and Editing
7.7%
Non-Profit Organization Management
7.7%
Other
46.2%
Most Helpful Reviews
Progress Telerik
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Scott W.
Verified User in Automotive
Telerik covers so many different languages and there is plenty of documentation and a broad knowledgebase.
Most Helpful Critical Review
Verified User in Oil & Energy
Telerik is just as difficult to use, if not more so, than libraries significantly older than it.
python wiki
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Verified User in Computer Software
I have recently started learning python and I often refer python wiki page for a detailed understanding of a function. Python wiki page has great detailed examples with usage which are very handy when you are scripting or need a quick reference.
Most Helpful Critical Review
Scott W.
Verified User in Automotive
Telerik covers so many different languages and there is plenty of documentation and a broad knowledgebase.
Verified User in Computer Software
I have recently started learning python and I often refer python wiki page for a detailed understanding of a function. Python wiki page has great detailed examples with usage which are very handy when you are scripting or need a quick reference.
Verified User in Oil & Energy
Telerik is just as difficult to use, if not more so, than libraries significantly older than it.
Alternatives
Discussions
What is Telerik UI?
2 comments
RS
Telerik UI helps in building application faster with less code, UI components are readily available to use for example Telerik Grid which comes with paging,...Read more
What is Telerik UI for asp net?
1 comment
JL
My experience with Telerik has been with Winforms, Windows UI and MVC. For asp.net, I imagine that, like the foregoing platforms, Telerik provides UI...Read more
What is Progress Telerik used for?
1 comment
JL
Telerik is used for enhancing the appearance and functionality of applications through enhanced efficiency of software development using proprietary...Read more
python wiki has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 2.5 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
or continue with
Gmail.com addresses not permitted. A business domain using Google is allowed.
By proceeding, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy