Best Software for 2025 is now live!

Compare OpenText UFT Developer and OpenText UFT One

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
OpenText UFT Developer
OpenText UFT Developer
Star Rating
(13)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (58.3% of reviews)
Information
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenText UFT Developer
OpenText UFT One
OpenText UFT One
Star Rating
(46)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (53.3% of reviews)
Information
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenText UFT One
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • Users report that OpenText UFT One excels in its "Test Variety" feature, allowing for a broader range of testing scenarios compared to OpenText UFT Developer, which has received mixed reviews on this aspect.
  • Reviewers mention that the "Quality of Support" for OpenText UFT One is rated higher at 8.5, with many users appreciating the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team, while OpenText UFT Developer's support quality is slightly lower at 8.1.
  • G2 users highlight that OpenText UFT One has a more user-friendly "Ease of Use" rating of 8.1, making it easier for teams to adopt and integrate into their workflows, whereas OpenText UFT Developer has a comparable rating of 8.2 but lacks some intuitive features that users find in UFT One.
  • Reviewers say that OpenText UFT One's "Test Feedback" functionality is particularly robust, providing detailed insights that help teams improve their testing processes, while OpenText UFT Developer's feedback mechanism is seen as less comprehensive.
  • Users on G2 report that OpenText UFT One has a better "Automation Reliability" score of 7.7, indicating fewer issues during automated testing, while OpenText UFT Developer struggles with reliability, leading to occasional test failures.
  • Users mention that OpenText UFT One's "Customization" capabilities are rated at 8.1, allowing for tailored testing solutions, whereas OpenText UFT Developer's customization options are perceived as limited, impacting its flexibility in various testing environments.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
OpenText UFT Developer
No pricing available
OpenText UFT One
No pricing available
Free Trial
OpenText UFT Developer
No trial information available
OpenText UFT One
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.3
10
8.7
40
Ease of Use
8.2
10
8.1
39
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
8.1
19
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
8.2
18
Quality of Support
8.1
9
8.5
38
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
8.4
16
Product Direction (% positive)
4.8
9
8.1
37
Features by Category
Not enough data
8.0
56
Functionality
Not enough data
8.1
8
Not enough data
7.9
8
Not enough data
8.1
8
Not enough data
8.3
8
Automation
Not enough data
8.1
8
Not enough data
7.7
8
Not enough data
8.1
8
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
OpenText UFT Developer
OpenText UFT Developer
OpenText UFT One
OpenText UFT One
OpenText UFT Developer and OpenText UFT One are categorized as Automation Testing and Software Testing
Unique Categories
OpenText UFT Developer
OpenText UFT Developer has no unique categories
OpenText UFT One
OpenText UFT One has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
OpenText UFT Developer
OpenText UFT Developer
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
8.3%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
58.3%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
33.3%
OpenText UFT One
OpenText UFT One
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
24.4%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
22.2%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
53.3%
Reviewers' Industry
OpenText UFT Developer
OpenText UFT Developer
Computer Software
50.0%
Information Technology and Services
16.7%
Consulting
8.3%
Financial Services
8.3%
Consumer Goods
8.3%
Other
8.3%
OpenText UFT One
OpenText UFT One
Information Technology and Services
35.6%
Computer Software
15.6%
Banking
6.7%
Hospital & Health Care
4.4%
Education Management
4.4%
Other
33.3%
Most Helpful Reviews
OpenText UFT Developer
OpenText UFT Developer
Most Helpful Favorable Review
soumya k.
SK
soumya k.
Verified User in Financial Services

I have used micro focus for a major period in my it career, I love the Demand of it in market and how the experience gets valued. Microfocus is a very easy to implement and quick learning tool. Microfocus is very reliable and no complexity. I am also...

Most Helpful Critical Review
OpenText UFT One
OpenText UFT One
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Verified User in Computer Software
GC
Verified User in Information Technology and Services

1.techie friendly, 2.very efficient, 3.have solution for complex things 4.integration part is minimal(test managing tools) 5.easy to setup(made one-click setup) 6.comes with vb script. 7.great in performance. 8.meets any kind of application

Most Helpful Critical Review
Verified User in Information Technology and Services
GI
Verified User in Information Technology and Services

Not supports parallel execution and it's too heavy coMpared to selenium

Alternatives
OpenText UFT Developer
OpenText UFT Developer Alternatives
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Add BrowserStack
Postman
Postman
Add Postman
LambdaTest
LambdaTest
Add LambdaTest
The UiPath Platform™
The UiPath Platform™
Add The UiPath Platform™
OpenText UFT One
OpenText UFT One Alternatives
Tricentis Tosca
Tricentis Tosca
Add Tricentis Tosca
Ranorex Studio
Ranorex Studio
Add Ranorex Studio
Cypress
Cypress
Add Cypress
TestComplete
TestComplete
Add TestComplete
Discussions
OpenText UFT Developer
OpenText UFT Developer Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
OpenText UFT Developer has no discussions with answers
OpenText UFT One
OpenText UFT One Discussions
Which feature of Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing displays VBScript code?
1 comment
Verified User
G2
Expert View, In this the users can view and edit the test's source code using VBScriptRead more
Monty the Mongoose crying
OpenText UFT One has no more discussions with answers