Compare OpenShot Video Editor and Windows Movie Maker 
- Users report that Windows Movie Maker excels in ease of use with a score of 9.2, making it a great choice for beginners who want to quickly create videos without a steep learning curve. In contrast, OpenShot Video Editor, while still user-friendly, has a slightly lower score of 9.0, which may indicate a bit more complexity in its interface.
- Reviewers mention that Windows Movie Maker has a solid audio mixing feature, scoring 8.7, which allows users to easily adjust audio levels and add background music. However, OpenShot Video Editor also offers good audio capabilities, but some users feel it lacks the intuitive controls found in Windows Movie Maker.
- G2 users highlight that OpenShot Video Editor shines in its product direction, with a positive score of 8.5, indicating a strong commitment to updates and new features. In comparison, Windows Movie Maker has a much lower score of 5.2, suggesting that users may feel the product is stagnant and not evolving to meet modern editing needs.
- Users on G2 report that OpenShot Video Editor offers better format compatibility with a score of 8.2, allowing for a wider range of video formats to be imported and exported. Windows Movie Maker, while functional, has been noted by reviewers to have limitations in this area, which can be frustrating for users working with diverse media types.
- Reviewers mention that the quality of support for OpenShot Video Editor is rated at 8.3, which is higher than Windows Movie Maker's score of 7.5. This suggests that users may find more responsive and helpful support when encountering issues with OpenShot.
- Users say that both products have strong clip editing capabilities, with Windows Movie Maker scoring 8.7 and OpenShot Video Editor matching that score. However, some users feel that OpenShot's additional features, like advanced transitions and effects, provide a more robust editing experience overall.
The most things I like in OpenShot Video Editor are as below: - There user interface is very easy to understand and use. - It is compatible with every OS like macOS, Windows OS, and Linux OS. - I can export my output file in my desired format easily.
My main issue has been that for any new video clip added, you have to manually reorganize your project to give it space. I have also not found how to mark the beginning and end of each clip which would be helpful instead of manually doing it.
Simplicity, ease-of-use and essentially zero-cost are the features I most enjoy. As most of the computers in the company run Windows, it makes sharing much easier than having to make different videos to suit different platforms, This saves me time as well...
Simplicity is a double edged sword. While Movie Maker makes it easy for the average user to operate it lacks in real production abilities. If you are looking at splitting audio and splicing with real ease, movie maker is not the right option.
The most things I like in OpenShot Video Editor are as below: - There user interface is very easy to understand and use. - It is compatible with every OS like macOS, Windows OS, and Linux OS. - I can export my output file in my desired format easily.
Simplicity, ease-of-use and essentially zero-cost are the features I most enjoy. As most of the computers in the company run Windows, it makes sharing much easier than having to make different videos to suit different platforms, This saves me time as well...
My main issue has been that for any new video clip added, you have to manually reorganize your project to give it space. I have also not found how to mark the beginning and end of each clip which would be helpful instead of manually doing it.
Simplicity is a double edged sword. While Movie Maker makes it easy for the average user to operate it lacks in real production abilities. If you are looking at splitting audio and splicing with real ease, movie maker is not the right option.
