Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare OpenFOAM and SOLIDWORKS 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
CMS IntelliCAD
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (63.6% of reviews)
Small-Business (43.3% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
OpenFOAM
Star Rating
(35)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (63.6% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenFOAMSOLIDWORKS
Star Rating
(620)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (43.3% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about SOLIDWORKSSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that SOLIDWORKS excels in ease of use with a score of 8.6, making it a preferred choice for beginners, while OpenFOAM's score of 6.7 indicates a steeper learning curve, particularly for those new to computational fluid dynamics.
- Reviewers mention that SOLIDWORKS offers superior CAD-CAM compatibility with a score of 8.8, allowing for seamless integration of design and manufacturing processes, whereas OpenFOAM, while strong in fluid analysis, lacks the same level of integration with CAM systems.
- G2 users highlight SOLIDWORKS' robust drawing tools, scoring 9.4, which are essential for creating detailed technical drawings, while OpenFOAM's drawing capabilities are less emphasized, reflecting its focus on simulation rather than design.
- Users on G2 report that SOLIDWORKS provides a comprehensive library of components with a score of 7.9, facilitating easier access to design elements, whereas OpenFOAM's library features are less extensive, which can hinder workflow efficiency.
- Reviewers mention that SOLIDWORKS shines in rendering tools with a score of 8.0, allowing for high-quality visualizations of designs, while OpenFOAM's rendering capabilities are not as developed, focusing more on simulation accuracy than visual output.
- Users say that SOLIDWORKS' quality of support is rated at 8.1, indicating a strong customer service experience, while OpenFOAM's support score of 6.1 suggests that users may face challenges in obtaining timely assistance when needed.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
OpenFOAM
No pricing availableSOLIDWORKS
No pricing availableFree Trial
OpenFOAM
No trial information availableSOLIDWORKS
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.0
26
8.8
516
Ease of Use
6.7
26
8.6
520
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
8.2
92
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
7.9
46
Quality of Support
6.1
21
8.1
457
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
8.3
46
Product Direction (% positive)
6.1
24
8.6
511
Features by Category
CAD to CAM
Not enough data
9.1
41
Not enough data
8.8
41
Not enough data
8.9
41
CNC Programming
Not enough data
8.6
37
Not enough data
8.6
37
Not enough data
8.4
36
Machining
Not enough data
8.6
38
Not enough data
8.7
38
Not enough data
8.7
38
Design
Not enough data
9.4
99
Not enough data
9.4
99
Not enough data
9.3
95
Not enough data
8.1
95
Edit
Not enough data
8.5
94
Not enough data
8.3
87
Not enough data
9.3
94
Not enough data
8.3
82
Collaboration
Not enough data
8.6
91
Not enough data
9.0
92
Not enough data
8.4
87
Library
Not enough data
8.8
27
Not enough data
8.5
26
Not enough data
8.3
27
Not enough data
8.6
22
CAD
Not enough data
8.9
23
Not enough data
9.4
29
Not enough data
9.0
28
Integration
Not enough data
8.5
25
Not enough data
9.6
27
Not enough data
8.5
23
Data
Not enough data
9.1
25
Not enough data
8.6
24
Not enough data
8.2
24
Not enough data
8.9
24
Not enough data
8.1
22
Not enough data
8.6
23
Logistics
Not enough data
9.1
25
File Support - Additive Manufacturing
Not enough data
8.8
60
Not enough data
8.6
46
Not enough data
8.4
51
File Editing - Additive Manufacturing
Not enough data
7.6
54
Not enough data
8.6
58
Software Integrations - Additive Manufacturing
Not enough data
7.6
48
Not enough data
8.8
57
Software Type - Additive Manufacturing
Not enough data
7.7
47
Not enough data
8.6
52
Generative AI - Additive Manufacturing
Not enough data
6.1
19
Not enough data
6.1
19
Building Preparation - Additive Manufacturing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
File Options
Not enough data
8.8
43
Not enough data
9.1
42
Not enough data
9.0
41
Not enough data
9.3
43
Not enough data
8.3
34
Not enough data
8.2
40
Tools
Not enough data
9.4
42
Not enough data
9.0
40
Not enough data
9.2
42
Design
Not enough data
9.4
42
Design
Not enough data
7.7
11
Not enough data
7.7
11
Tools
Not enough data
9.2
12
Not enough data
8.8
12
Library
Not enough data
8.1
12
Platform
Not enough data
8.5
12
Not enough data
7.9
11
Customization
Not enough data
7.6
11
Not enough data
8.2
11
Design
6.2
11
9.2
59
6.1
11
9.0
59
6.8
11
8.8
59
7.1
12
7.6
58
Tools
8.8
13
7.9
52
6.5
8
7.9
54
6.3
8
7.3
47
Work
6.7
8
7.5
40
6.9
9
7.8
41
7.1
8
8.2
48
6.4
7
8.1
43
6.9
9
8.4
46
Environment
7.1
8
8.3
52
6.8
10
8.4
50
7.4
7
8.2
48
7.2
12
8.6
52
Tools - Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)
Not enough data
9.2
24
Not enough data
8.4
23
Not enough data
9.2
24
Not enough data
9.0
24
Not enough data
7.6
24
File Options - Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)
Not enough data
8.5
24
Not enough data
8.4
24
Not enough data
8.3
24
Not enough data
8.2
23
Not enough data
7.8
25
Customization - Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)
Not enough data
8.3
21
Not enough data
8.3
21
Not enough data
7.5
22
Not enough data
8.2
22
Environment - Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)
Not enough data
8.3
22
Not enough data
8.3
22
Not enough data
7.8
22
Not enough data
8.8
23
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
OpenFOAM and SOLIDWORKS are categorized as Simulation & CAE
Unique Categories
OpenFOAM has no unique categories
SOLIDWORKS is categorized as Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD), General-Purpose CAD, CAD Viewers, Sketching, PCB Design, Computer-Aided Manufacturing (CAM), CAD Libraries, CAD Data Exchange, and Additive Manufacturing
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
OpenFOAM
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
SOLIDWORKS
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
30.3%
Automotive
18.2%
Research
12.1%
Higher Education
9.1%
Oil & Energy
6.1%
Other
24.2%
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
22.7%
Design
12.1%
Automotive
6.6%
Electrical/Electronic Manufacturing
6.0%
Medical Devices
5.8%
Other
46.9%
Alternatives
Discussions
What do you use as mesher? Are there free ones that are good for complex geometries?
1 Comment
CH
I used snappyHexMesh to mesh a complicated geometry and it did well. Many like cfMesh too. If snappyHexMesh is used, can use blockMesh to generate background...Read more
OpenFOAM has no more discussions with answers
What is SOLIDWORKS used for?
3 Comments
YP
SOLIDWORKS IS USED FOR MULTIPLE WORK LIKE 2D & 3D CAD MODELING, ASSEMBLY MODELING, SHWWET METAL MODELING, SURFACE MODELING, RENDERING, SIMULATION, 3D...Read more
best use o this software
2 Comments
OS
Making 2D sketches and extruding them to make 3d sketches.Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
