Compare Notepad++ and PureBasic 
- Users report that PureBasic excels in ease of use with a score of 9.7, making it a favorite among small business users who appreciate its straightforward interface, while Notepad++ follows closely with a score of 9.3.
- Reviewers mention that Notepad++ shines in its syntax highlighting capabilities, scoring 9.1, which enhances code readability significantly compared to PureBasic's score of 8.0.
- G2 users highlight that Notepad++ offers superior find and replace functionality with a score of 9.3, which is particularly beneficial for users dealing with large codebases, while PureBasic's score is 8.3.
- Users on G2 report that PureBasic's collaborative editing feature scores 9.0, making it a strong choice for teams, whereas Notepad++ scores lower at 8.0, indicating less emphasis on collaborative features.
- Reviewers mention that Notepad++ has a robust plugin and integration ecosystem, scoring 8.5, which allows for extensive customization, while PureBasic's score of 8.0 suggests fewer options in this area.
- Users say that PureBasic's extensibility is rated at 8.7, which appeals to developers looking for a customizable programming environment, while Notepad++ does not have a comparable score in this category.
i like every feature of notepad++ that i have used in past few months .notepad++ support multi languages(this feature is not much use for me as html coder) ,correct spelling mistakes and It also include the auto detection of the programming language that in...
Notepad++ is still a very limited text editor with restrictive features. I think of it as more of an upgrade of Windows' Notepad instead of a legitimate competition for much more advanced tools like atom and sublime text. The only thing that Notepad++...
Some of PureBasic's best features are that it is cross-platform ( Windows, Linux and Macintosh ), easily extended by creating libraries, the compiler is fast and creates highly optimized executables with small footprints. I also find that the user...
The graphical interface builder that comes with the IDE leaves a lot to be desired. There are free third party GUI editing tools that work much better than PureBasic's built in one. Overall, if your software solution needs a GUI, you're better using...
i like every feature of notepad++ that i have used in past few months .notepad++ support multi languages(this feature is not much use for me as html coder) ,correct spelling mistakes and It also include the auto detection of the programming language that in...
Some of PureBasic's best features are that it is cross-platform ( Windows, Linux and Macintosh ), easily extended by creating libraries, the compiler is fast and creates highly optimized executables with small footprints. I also find that the user...
Notepad++ is still a very limited text editor with restrictive features. I think of it as more of an upgrade of Windows' Notepad instead of a legitimate competition for much more advanced tools like atom and sublime text. The only thing that Notepad++...
The graphical interface builder that comes with the IDE leaves a lot to be desired. There are free third party GUI editing tools that work much better than PureBasic's built in one. Overall, if your software solution needs a GUI, you're better using...
