Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare .NET and Qt 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
1oT
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Opti Digital
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (51.7% of reviews)
Small-Business (48.1% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$999 per year
No pricing available
.NET
Star Rating
(95)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (51.7% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
$999 per year
Browse all 3 pricing plansQt
Star Rating
(53)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (48.1% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about QtSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that .NET excels in customization, with a score of 8.6, allowing developers to tailor applications extensively, while Qt, with a score of 8.0, offers less flexibility in this area.
- Reviewers mention that .NET's ease of use is rated at 8.5, making it more user-friendly for beginners compared to Qt's score of 9.0, which indicates a slightly steeper learning curve for new users.
- G2 users highlight that .NET provides superior patching and updates with a score of 8.5, ensuring that users receive timely improvements, whereas Qt's score of 7.7 suggests that users may experience delays in updates.
- Users on G2 report that .NET's multi-language support is robust, scoring 8.2, which is slightly lower than Qt's 8.3, indicating that Qt may have a slight edge in supporting various programming languages.
- Reviewers say that .NET's file management capabilities are rated at 7.9, which is comparable to Qt's 7.7, but users feel that .NET offers a more intuitive interface for managing files.
- Users report that .NET has a more comprehensive help guide system, both scoring 8.3, but .NET's resources are often described as more detailed and user-friendly, aiding in quicker problem resolution.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
.NET
BUSINESS
$999
per year
Includes everything that comes with Indie plus:
- Xamarin.Forms
- Xamarin Test Cloud Access
- Visual Studio Integration
Qt
No pricing availableFree Trial
.NET
No trial information availableQt
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.5
80
8.5
45
Ease of Use
8.0
83
8.4
45
Ease of Setup
8.1
37
8.5
13
Ease of Admin
8.1
28
8.3
11
Quality of Support
8.0
77
8.3
30
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.5
28
7.8
10
Product Direction (% positive)
8.5
80
8.2
45
Features by Category
Python Integrated Development Environments (IDE)Hide 7 FeaturesShow 7 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
C/C++ Integrated Development Environments (IDE)Hide 7 FeaturesShow 7 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Application Design
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Application Control
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
8.4
18
9.2
6
8.0
17
8.1
6
8.1
17
8.6
6
8.4
18
8.3
6
8.5
16
8.9
6
8.4
15
8.6
6
8.6
16
8.1
6
Platform - App Monetization Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Advertising - App Monetization Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Core Lifecycle Management - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Organization - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Mobile Development Platforms
7.6
7
Not enough data
7.6
7
Not enough data
7.4
7
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
.NET and Qt are categorized as Mobile Development Platforms and Application Development Platforms
Unique Categories
.NET has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
.NET
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Qt
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
26.1%
Information Technology and Services
21.6%
Hospital & Health Care
5.7%
Internet
4.5%
Program Development
3.4%
Other
38.6%
Computer Software
28.8%
Information Technology and Services
7.7%
Telecommunications
5.8%
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
5.8%
Higher Education
5.8%
Other
46.2%
Alternatives
Discussions
Which is best MVVM framework for Xamarin.Forms and What is future of Xamarin?
1 Comment
SH
The best MVVM Frame work is FreshMVVM, sure the Xamarin have a great future in cross-platform development, in this lead the next step is MAUI, which will...Read more
Is xamarin form good?
1 Comment
NS
Yes, Absolutely I prefere to develop Xamarin Form instead of all other hybrid and native application development toolRead more
.NET has no more discussions with answers
What are the primary benefits of QtCreator?
1 Comment
LR
QtCreator has many benefits:
+ It is stable mature software being continuously developed and maintained following best practices since 1995.
+ It has...Read more
What is the use of Qt Creator?
1 Comment
SP
It’s a multi-platform Développement IDE available for windows, Linux, macOS, android and others.Read more
Is Qt Creator IDE free?
1 Comment
SP
QT Creator is the development IDE, you can use the IDE however the QT libraries are only free for open source development which means if you use the open...Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
