Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Mendeley and Web of Science 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (48.5% of reviews)
Mid-Market (55.6% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Mendeley
Star Rating
(247)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (48.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about MendeleyWeb of Science
Star Rating
(11)4.9 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (55.6% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Web of ScienceSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Reviewers mention that Mendeley excels in its "Ease of Setup" with a score of 9.2, making it user-friendly for new users, while Web of Science lacks this clarity, resulting in a lower score of 8.1 for "Ease of Use".
- Users report that Mendeley's "Quality of Support" is rated at 7.9, which some find lacking compared to Web of Science, which has a more robust support system, although specific ratings for support were not provided.
- G2 users highlight that Mendeley has a strong "Product Direction" score of 8.0, indicating a positive outlook for future updates, while Web of Science shines with a perfect score of 10.0, suggesting a clear and innovative roadmap ahead.
- Users on G2 mention that Mendeley is particularly beneficial for its "Ease of Admin" with a score of 9.6, which allows administrators to manage references and documents efficiently, a feature that Web of Science does not emphasize as strongly.
- Reviewers say that Mendeley is favored for its integration capabilities with other tools, which enhances workflow, while Web of Science is noted for its comprehensive citation analysis features, appealing to users focused on research impact.
- Users report that Mendeley has a larger user base in the "Enterprise" segment, with 48.7% of reviews coming from this market, while Web of Science is more popular in the "Mid-Market" segment, with 62.5% of reviews, indicating different target audiences for each product.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Mendeley
No pricing availableWeb of Science
No pricing availableFree Trial
Mendeley
No trial information availableWeb of Science
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.6
220
9.5
7
Ease of Use
8.7
220
8.3
7
Ease of Setup
9.4
14
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
9.6
9
Not enough data
Quality of Support
7.9
141
Not enough data
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.9
6
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
8.0
213
10.0
7
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Mendeley and Web of Science are categorized as Reference Management
Unique Categories
Mendeley has no unique categories
Web of Science has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Mendeley
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Web of Science
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Higher Education
42.7%
Research
23.2%
Education Management
7.1%
Hospital & Health Care
2.5%
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
2.1%
Other
22.4%
Research
55.6%
Libraries
22.2%
Higher Education
11.1%
Education Management
11.1%
‐
Other
0.0%
Discussions
What is the function of software Mendeley?
2 Comments
RS
Its main uses are: reading texts and organizing academic referencesRead more
Why is Mojave not supported after a year of release?
1 Comment
AZ
I use Mojave and it is totally supported. Let download the mac os version of mendeley desktop.Read more
Web of Science has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
