Compare Marathon and Red Hat OpenShift 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (50.0% of reviews)
Enterprise (45.1% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Marathon
Star Rating
(10)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (50.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about MarathonRed Hat OpenShift
Star Rating
(238)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (45.1% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Red Hat OpenShiftSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Marathon excels in application deployment with a score of 9.2, highlighting its seamless integration and efficiency in deploying applications. In contrast, Red Hat OpenShift, while still strong, has a slightly lower score in this area, which some users feel affects their deployment speed.
- Reviewers mention that Red Hat OpenShift shines in its development environment, scoring 9.0, which users appreciate for its robust tools and flexibility. Marathon, with a score of 9.0 as well, is noted for its simplicity, but some users feel it lacks the advanced features found in OpenShift.
- G2 users highlight that Red Hat OpenShift offers superior support quality, with a score of 8.4, which many users attribute to its extensive documentation and responsive customer service. Marathon, however, does not have a support score listed, leading some users to express concerns about the availability of assistance when needed.
- Users on G2 report that both products perform well in auto-scaling, with Marathon scoring 8.6 and Red Hat OpenShift also receiving positive feedback. However, reviewers mention that OpenShift's auto-scaling capabilities are more customizable, allowing for better resource management in larger environments.
- Reviewers say that Marathon's architecture score of 8.8 is impressive, particularly for mid-market users who value its straightforward setup. In comparison, Red Hat OpenShift's architecture is praised for its enterprise-level capabilities, but some users feel it can be overly complex for smaller teams.
- Users report that Marathon's container networking score of 8.9 is a strong point, with many appreciating its ease of use. Conversely, Red Hat OpenShift's networking features are noted for their robustness, but some users mention that the learning curve can be steep for new users.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Marathon
No pricing availableRed Hat OpenShift
No pricing availableFree Trial
Marathon
No trial information availableRed Hat OpenShift
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.3
8
8.6
78
Ease of Use
8.3
8
8.4
167
Ease of Setup
7.2
6
8.1
137
Ease of Admin
8.6
6
8.5
54
Quality of Support
Not enough data
8.4
69
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
8.6
50
Product Direction (% positive)
8.5
8
8.9
75
Features by Category
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Alerts management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Monitoring
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Issue Resolution
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Development
Not enough data
9.2
20
Not enough data
8.3
14
Not enough data
9.0
14
Not enough data
9.0
15
Not enough data
9.1
13
Database
Not enough data
8.1
18
Not enough data
8.1
18
Not enough data
8.6
19
Not enough data
8.1
18
Not enough data
8.4
19
Infrastructure
Not enough data
8.6
20
Not enough data
9.0
17
Not enough data
9.1
21
Management
Not enough data
8.4
29
Not enough data
8.3
28
Not enough data
8.0
27
Organization
Not enough data
8.4
29
Not enough data
8.9
30
Not enough data
9.0
28
Development
Not enough data
8.5
24
Not enough data
8.8
27
Not enough data
8.5
22
Not enough data
9.1
23
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Marathon and Red Hat OpenShift are categorized as Container Orchestration
Unique Categories
Marathon has no unique categories
Red Hat OpenShift is categorized as Container Monitoring, Container Management, Cloud Platform as a Service (PaaS), and Server Virtualization
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Marathon
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Red Hat OpenShift
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
20.0%
Computer Software
20.0%
Transportation/Trucking/Railroad
10.0%
Telecommunications
10.0%
Online Media
10.0%
Other
30.0%
Information Technology and Services
15.6%
Financial Services
12.1%
Banking
10.7%
Computer Software
9.8%
Telecommunications
5.4%
Other
46.4%
Most Helpful Reviews
Marathon
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Valeri K.
Verified User in Transportation/Trucking/Railroad
Marathon's a great point-and-click UI for managing docker containers. Restarting, adding more instances, and suspending your app servers only takes a couple clicks.
Most Helpful Critical Review
Red Hat OpenShift
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Luis Felipe B.
Verified User in Information Technology and Services
What I like most is the support having to deploy applications in different programming languages. Besides having different database handlers and additional tools like cron
Most Helpful Critical Review
Silvio N.
Verified User in Information Technology and Services
Since not directly involved in the project, there are no negative points reported at the moment.
Valeri K.
Verified User in Transportation/Trucking/Railroad
Marathon's a great point-and-click UI for managing docker containers. Restarting, adding more instances, and suspending your app servers only takes a couple clicks.
Luis Felipe B.
Verified User in Information Technology and Services
What I like most is the support having to deploy applications in different programming languages. Besides having different database handlers and additional tools like cron
Silvio N.
Verified User in Information Technology and Services
Since not directly involved in the project, there are no negative points reported at the moment.
Alternatives
Discussions
Marathon has no discussions with answers
What is included in Red Hat OpenShift container platform?
1 comment
NG
you can deploy your applications and have UI which is more superior to Kubernetes. operator development, etc.. all features of k8s are present in OCP.Read more
Red Hat OpenShift has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 2.5 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
or continue with
Gmail.com addresses not permitted. A business domain using Google is allowed.
By proceeding, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
