Compare Lookback and Loop11 
- Reviewers mention that Lookback excels in user experience with a star rating of 4.3, while Loop11 has a lower rating of 3.6, indicating that Lookback may provide a more intuitive interface for users.
- Users report that Lookback's ease of setup is rated a perfect 10.0, suggesting that it is exceptionally user-friendly for new users, whereas Loop11 does not have a score in this area, which may indicate potential challenges during initial setup.
- G2 users highlight that Lookback offers superior participant selection methods, particularly with its in-app capabilities, which reviewers say enhances the overall research process compared to Loop11's more limited options.
- Users on G2 mention that Lookback's collaboration features are rated at 9.4, making it a strong choice for teams needing to work together effectively, while Loop11's collaboration tools are not as highly rated, indicating a potential gap in team functionality.
- Reviewers say that Lookback's product direction is rated at 10.0, reflecting a strong confidence in the software's future development, while Loop11's score of 8.8 suggests that users may have some reservations about its ongoing improvements.
- Users report that Lookback's quality of support is rated at 8.2, which is slightly lower than Loop11's 8.5, indicating that while both products offer support, Loop11 may have a slight edge in customer service responsiveness.
- Full features of the Enterprise subscription for 14 days
It's fantastic to be able to test our forthcoming iPhone app remotely with live users.
Users have a lot of difficulty with the plug-in, which sometimes causes no-shows. I found out that some of the users came to the session, but we could not see each other for some reason.
The product is generally good, especially for beginners.
One aspect that needs to be improved is the inclusion of accessibility analysis and responsiveness testing for web applications. There is room for improvement in the API provided for regression testing. The limited customization options for usability tests...
It's fantastic to be able to test our forthcoming iPhone app remotely with live users.
The product is generally good, especially for beginners.
Users have a lot of difficulty with the plug-in, which sometimes causes no-shows. I found out that some of the users came to the session, but we could not see each other for some reason.
One aspect that needs to be improved is the inclusion of accessibility analysis and responsiveness testing for web applications. There is room for improvement in the API provided for regression testing. The limited customization options for usability tests...
