Compare LaunchDarkly and Split by Harness 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (46.9% of reviews)
Mid-Market (44.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$0.00
Free 10 Seats
LaunchDarkly
Star Rating
(494)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (46.9% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$0.00
Browse all 3 pricing plansSplit by Harness
Star Rating
(145)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (44.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free 10 Seats
Browse all 4 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that LaunchDarkly excels in its Flag Management capabilities, scoring 9.3, which allows for seamless control over feature flags. In contrast, Split by Harness, while still strong at 9.2, does not offer the same level of intuitive management that users appreciate in LaunchDarkly.
- Reviewers mention that Split by Harness shines in Feature Testing, achieving a score of 9.5, which is higher than LaunchDarkly's 9.1. Users appreciate the robust testing options available, allowing for more comprehensive experimentation.
- G2 users highlight the Quality of Support as a significant advantage for Split by Harness, with a score of 9.3 compared to LaunchDarkly's 8.8. Reviewers often note the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team, making it easier to resolve issues quickly.
- Users on G2 report that LaunchDarkly's Multi-Environment Control feature, scoring 8.7, is particularly beneficial for teams managing multiple deployments. However, Split by Harness outperforms in this area with a score of 9.4, indicating a more robust solution for users needing extensive environment management.
- Reviewers mention that the Low-Code Interface of Split by Harness, scoring 8.7, is more user-friendly compared to LaunchDarkly's 8.5. This feature is particularly appreciated by teams looking to implement changes without extensive coding knowledge.
- Users say that while both products offer Analytics capabilities, Split by Harness's reporting and analytics features, scoring 7.9, are perceived as more comprehensive than LaunchDarkly's 7.2, with users noting better insights and data visualization options.
Featured Products
Sponsored
ABsmartly
(14)
A/B Testing
Visit Website
Sponsored
Codemagic
(13)
A/B Testing
Visit Website
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
LaunchDarkly
Developer
$0.00
Feature flagging for your passion project. Start for free; pay only when you exceed Developer tier limits
- 1 project
- 3 environments
- 5 service connections per month
Split by Harness
Developer
Free
10 Seats
Get started with easy-to-use feature flags.
Developer includes:
- Client and server side feature flags
- Slack, Jira Cloud, Azure DevOps integrations and more
- Rich API
Free Trial
LaunchDarkly
Free Trial is available
Split by Harness
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.0
436
9.2
112
Ease of Use
8.7
447
8.9
114
Ease of Setup
8.6
275
8.8
44
Ease of Admin
8.9
104
9.0
33
Quality of Support
8.8
284
9.3
82
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.0
94
9.4
33
Product Direction (% positive)
9.1
437
8.9
114
Features by Category
Functionality
9.0
175
9.0
49
8.6
180
8.8
42
8.1
168
8.6
41
Management
8.5
173
8.7
47
7.6
174
7.5
36
7.8
164
8.0
34
Management
9.3
379
9.2
71
8.9
365
9.1
64
7.7
354
8.0
49
Functionality
8.7
371
9.4
68
9.1
370
9.6
71
8.5
353
8.7
54
Computing
Feature Not Available
Feature Not Available
Feature Not Available
6.6
29
Feature Not Available
8.4
46
Experimental Design
8.3
133
8.8
42
8.4
134
8.8
41
7.9
128
8.7
38
Analytics
7.2
131
8.1
34
Feature Not Available
7.7
28
Variation Testing
Not enough data
9.7
6
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
8.9
6
Not enough data
8.7
5
Reporting
Not enough data
9.3
7
Not enough data
8.9
6
Personalization
Not enough data
9.0
7
Not enough data
8.8
7
Not enough data
8.9
6
Administration
Not enough data
8.3
6
Not enough data
9.0
7
Not enough data
9.7
6
Not enough data
9.5
7
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
LaunchDarkly and Split by Harness are categorized as Feature Management, A/B Testing, and Continuous Delivery
Unique Categories
LaunchDarkly has no unique categories
Split by Harness is categorized as Configuration Management and Mobile App Optimization
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
LaunchDarkly
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Split by Harness
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
30.8%
Information Technology and Services
10.0%
Financial Services
6.7%
Entertainment
5.5%
Construction
4.1%
Other
42.9%
Computer Software
31.0%
Financial Services
12.7%
Information Technology and Services
9.9%
Health, Wellness and Fitness
4.2%
Hospital & Health Care
2.8%
Other
39.4%
Most Helpful Reviews
LaunchDarkly
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Sagi H.
Verified User in Construction
easy to control FFs in many environments
Most Helpful Critical Review
Verified User in Financial Services
Doesn't have paid plan per monthly active users Doesn't have advanced audience rule sets
Split by Harness
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Verified User in Transportation/Trucking/Railroad
One of the best parts about Split was the ability to control our roll outs. Meaning, we could slow play the roll outs and only push 25% out. Also, as the title reads, their A/B testing was an absolute cakewalk.
Most Helpful Critical Review
David X.
Verified User in Computer Software
No typescript SDK No seperate packages for client and server side SDKs Occasional failures on the client to fetch feature flags Ability to split traffic is behind what we had with something like LaunchDarkly. Like their distribute treatments...
Sagi H.
Verified User in Construction
easy to control FFs in many environments
Verified User in Transportation/Trucking/Railroad
One of the best parts about Split was the ability to control our roll outs. Meaning, we could slow play the roll outs and only push 25% out. Also, as the title reads, their A/B testing was an absolute cakewalk.
Verified User in Financial Services
Doesn't have paid plan per monthly active users Doesn't have advanced audience rule sets
David X.
Verified User in Computer Software
No typescript SDK No seperate packages for client and server side SDKs Occasional failures on the client to fetch feature flags Ability to split traffic is behind what we had with something like LaunchDarkly. Like their distribute treatments...
Alternatives
Discussions
How do I use LaunchDarkly?
1 comment
VR
Refer to their developer guide or SDK; they provide the snippet and imports that you can use in your code.Read more
What is LaunchDarkly used for?
1 comment
LN
Mostly we use for A/B Testing. Turn on new feature for subset of users and turn on/off new feature when we first release.Read more
LaunchDarkly has no more discussions with answers
What is a split io?
1 comment
Official Response from Split by Harness
Split provides an industry-leading Feature Delivery Platform which enables companies to embrace Impact-Driven Development across their engineering...Read more
Is Split IO free?
1 comment
Official Response from Split by Harness
Check out our pricing page! https://www.split.io/pricing/
We offer a free Developer Tier for up to 10 seats.
Additionally, sign up for Split's free trial,...Read more
What is streaming Split IO?
1 comment
Official Response from Split by Harness
Split’s high-performance, streaming architecture pushes flag and experiment changes via CDN to our SDKs in milliseconds.
Read more about Split's Approach...Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 2.5 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
