Compare Kubernetes and SaltStack 
- Users report that SaltStack excels in its "Automated Provisioning" feature, scoring a remarkable 9.3, which allows for seamless infrastructure management and deployment. In contrast, Kubernetes, while strong in "Orchestration" with a score of 9.6, can be more complex to set up for automated provisioning tasks.
- Reviewers mention that SaltStack's "Configuration Monitoring" feature stands out with a score of 9.0, providing users with robust compliance and configuration management capabilities. Kubernetes, while effective, does not have a dedicated feature that matches this level of monitoring, leading to potential gaps in compliance tracking.
- G2 users highlight that SaltStack's "Task Management" feature, rated at 8.5, offers a user-friendly interface for managing tasks, making it easier for teams to collaborate. Kubernetes, on the other hand, has a slightly lower score in this area, which may affect user experience when managing tasks across containers.
- Users on G2 report that SaltStack's "Administration Console" is rated at 8.7, providing a comprehensive view of system health and performance. Kubernetes, while it has a solid administration interface, scores lower in ease of use, which can lead to a steeper learning curve for new users.
- Reviewers say that SaltStack's "Quality of Support" is rated at 7.7, which some users find lacking compared to Kubernetes, which boasts a higher score of 8.4. This difference can significantly impact user satisfaction, especially for enterprises that require timely support.
- Users report that Kubernetes shines in "Container Networking" with a score of 9.0, allowing for efficient communication between containers. SaltStack, while it has strong networking capabilities, does not specialize in container networking to the same extent, which may be a consideration for users focused on containerized applications.
Kubernetes is a sweet spot between flexibility and simplicity. Especially service discovery is made very simple. Competitors often are either to simple (Docker compose, swarm, fleet) or too complex (Marathon). Once it is up and running, low-level...
It's extremely immature (very buggy), the networking is just...painful, the scheduler is dumb and slow; those are my technical dislikes. My personal dislike is the overall lack of cohesive documentation as well as the assertion that just because there...
My favorite feature is the flexibility that formulas provide. Being able to define a single set of options that are easily portable across multiple platforms and versions means I can set once and relax.
I can name several things. * The biggest one is that I often have to redeploy changes 2 or more times. this mostly has to do with Salt's brain-dead implementation of git. * It's error messages and output is often cryptic and meaningless. Debugging Salt...
Kubernetes is a sweet spot between flexibility and simplicity. Especially service discovery is made very simple. Competitors often are either to simple (Docker compose, swarm, fleet) or too complex (Marathon). Once it is up and running, low-level...
My favorite feature is the flexibility that formulas provide. Being able to define a single set of options that are easily portable across multiple platforms and versions means I can set once and relax.
It's extremely immature (very buggy), the networking is just...painful, the scheduler is dumb and slow; those are my technical dislikes. My personal dislike is the overall lack of cohesive documentation as well as the assertion that just because there...
I can name several things. * The biggest one is that I often have to redeploy changes 2 or more times. this mostly has to do with Salt's brain-dead implementation of git. * It's error messages and output is often cryptic and meaningless. Debugging Salt...
![Yiorgos [George] A.](/assets/transparent-ad5be28fbcd25b7b08d2cebe1d957125437fb5407d75ee717965ad22c8808791.gif "Yiorgos [George] A.")
