Compare Kubernetes and Marathon 
- Users report that Kubernetes excels in orchestration with a score of 9.6, while Marathon, with a score of 8.5, is noted for its simplicity but lacks some advanced orchestration features that Kubernetes offers.
- Reviewers mention that Kubernetes has a robust developer toolkit rated at 8.6, which includes features like Helm for package management, whereas Marathon's toolkit is perceived as less comprehensive, impacting developer productivity.
- G2 users highlight Kubernetes' strong access control features with a score of 8.7, providing fine-grained permissions, while Marathon's access control is seen as more basic, which may not meet the needs of larger enterprises.
- Users on G2 report that Kubernetes offers superior container networking capabilities with a score of 9.0, allowing for complex networking setups, while Marathon's networking features are simpler and may not support advanced configurations.
- Reviewers say that Kubernetes has a higher quality of support rated at 8.4, with a larger community and more resources available, compared to Marathon, which has received mixed reviews regarding its support services.
- Users mention that Kubernetes has a better product direction with a score of 9.7, indicating a strong roadmap and continuous improvement, while Marathon's product direction is rated lower at 8.5, suggesting less frequent updates and enhancements.
Kubernetes is a sweet spot between flexibility and simplicity. Especially service discovery is made very simple. Competitors often are either to simple (Docker compose, swarm, fleet) or too complex (Marathon). Once it is up and running, low-level...
It's extremely immature (very buggy), the networking is just...painful, the scheduler is dumb and slow; those are my technical dislikes. My personal dislike is the overall lack of cohesive documentation as well as the assertion that just because there...
Marathon's a great point-and-click UI for managing docker containers. Restarting, adding more instances, and suspending your app servers only takes a couple clicks.
Kubernetes is a sweet spot between flexibility and simplicity. Especially service discovery is made very simple. Competitors often are either to simple (Docker compose, swarm, fleet) or too complex (Marathon). Once it is up and running, low-level...
Marathon's a great point-and-click UI for managing docker containers. Restarting, adding more instances, and suspending your app servers only takes a couple clicks.
It's extremely immature (very buggy), the networking is just...painful, the scheduler is dumb and slow; those are my technical dislikes. My personal dislike is the overall lack of cohesive documentation as well as the assertion that just because there...
![Yiorgos [George] A.](/assets/transparent-ad5be28fbcd25b7b08d2cebe1d957125437fb5407d75ee717965ad22c8808791.gif "Yiorgos [George] A.")
