Compare Kualitee and Tricentis qTest 
- Users report that Tricentis qTest excels in its Test Repository functionality, scoring 8.9, which allows for efficient organization and management of test cases. In contrast, Kualitee, while still strong at 9.0, offers a more user-friendly interface that reviewers mention makes it easier to navigate and utilize.
- Reviewers mention that Kualitee's reporting capabilities stand out with a score of 9.0, providing comprehensive insights into testing progress and results. Tricentis qTest, with a score of 8.2, is noted for its reporting but lacks some of the advanced analytics features that Kualitee offers.
- Users on G2 highlight that Tricentis qTest has a robust Test Feedback feature, scoring 9.2, which allows for detailed feedback collection from testers. Kualitee, while also strong in this area, scores slightly lower at 8.7, indicating that Tricentis may provide a more thorough feedback mechanism.
- G2 users report that Kualitee shines in its ease of use, with a score of 8.9, making it a preferred choice for teams looking for a straightforward setup. In comparison, Tricentis qTest has a score of 8.2, with some users mentioning a steeper learning curve when first adopting the software.
- Reviewers mention that Tricentis qTest's automation capabilities are impressive, particularly in organization and reliability, scoring 9.3 and 9.2 respectively. Kualitee, while effective, does not match this level of thoroughness, scoring 9.0 in automation, which some users feel limits its effectiveness in larger projects.
- Users say that Kualitee's integration capabilities are strong, with a score of 8.4, allowing for seamless connections with other tools. Tricentis qTest, with a score of 8.1, is noted for having fewer integration options, which some reviewers find limiting in a multi-tool environment.
I like that you can set up an unlimited number of projects, create testing teams and the dashboard is useful to track your progress. It allows you to re-use test cases suites as in the instance of regression testing. There is also a reporting feature.
Sometimes, when we open defects from email, all details will be empty. It happens even on very high internet so not an internet issue. Sometimes it's a little slow. It takes a little bit of time to load things. Initially, it took me little time to...
The API allows us to be flexible in our testing strategy. We are able to easily aggregate results from several different sources to give a complete testing picture. This tool seems to have taken a more forward thinking approach vs other tools we evaluated...
Overall support for automated tests is not great: We need to be able to easily integrate with any open source testing framework and it's more code than expected
I like that you can set up an unlimited number of projects, create testing teams and the dashboard is useful to track your progress. It allows you to re-use test cases suites as in the instance of regression testing. There is also a reporting feature.
The API allows us to be flexible in our testing strategy. We are able to easily aggregate results from several different sources to give a complete testing picture. This tool seems to have taken a more forward thinking approach vs other tools we evaluated...
Sometimes, when we open defects from email, all details will be empty. It happens even on very high internet so not an internet issue. Sometimes it's a little slow. It takes a little bit of time to load things. Initially, it took me little time to...
Overall support for automated tests is not great: We need to be able to easily integrate with any open source testing framework and it's more code than expected
