Compare Kualitee and PractiTest 
- Users report that PractiTest excels in its Test Repository functionality, scoring 8.9, which allows for efficient organization and management of test cases. In contrast, Kualitee, while slightly higher at 9.0, does not offer the same level of customization that some users desire.
- Reviewers mention that PractiTest's Quality of Support is rated at 9.1, indicating a strong commitment to customer service. Kualitee, with a score of 8.9, has received feedback suggesting that response times could be improved.
- G2 users highlight PractiTest's superior Requirements Listing feature, scoring 9.1, which helps teams keep track of project requirements effectively. Kualitee's similar feature, while functional, scored lower, indicating less satisfaction among users.
- Users on G2 report that Kualitee shines in Reporting, achieving a score of 9.0, which is praised for its intuitive dashboards and visualizations. PractiTest, with a score of 8.6, is seen as less user-friendly in this area.
- Reviewers mention that both products have similar scores for Test Diversity at 8.7, but PractiTest is noted for its ability to handle a wider range of testing types, which some users find beneficial for complex projects.
- Users say that Kualitee's Automated Creation & Testing feature, scoring 9.2, is particularly robust, allowing for seamless integration into CI/CD pipelines. PractiTest, while offering automation, does not match the same level of integration ease, which some users find limiting.
- Issues, Requirements, Tests, and Test Sets & Runs
- Unlimited Custom Fields and Filters
- Unlimited Projects
Integration with JIRA, very convenient for teams using JIRA as their issue tracker and Kualitee as a baseline test management option, where bugs and issues can be logged here and forth in both tools and teams can work independently on different...
It's Slow. Responsive Design. Integration with other tools.
1. Visibility Visibility Visibility!!! The dashboard is amazing. I can create new tabs for my personal use and use fields and filters for the data. We use also the external dashboards and it really helps us all be aligned (we have it right in-front of the...
Search feature returns are head-scratching--searching for specific test cases rarely return anything useful. Filters and Folders structures are convoluted and archaic--ultimately these become catch-all areas and become useless over time. Mass editing is...
Integration with JIRA, very convenient for teams using JIRA as their issue tracker and Kualitee as a baseline test management option, where bugs and issues can be logged here and forth in both tools and teams can work independently on different...
1. Visibility Visibility Visibility!!! The dashboard is amazing. I can create new tabs for my personal use and use fields and filters for the data. We use also the external dashboards and it really helps us all be aligned (we have it right in-front of the...
It's Slow. Responsive Design. Integration with other tools.
Search feature returns are head-scratching--searching for specific test cases rarely return anything useful. Filters and Folders structures are convoluted and archaic--ultimately these become catch-all areas and become useless over time. Mass editing is...
