- Home
- ...
- Product Management Software
- Jira
- OpenText Application Quality Management
- Jira-vs-OpenText Application Quality Management
Compare Jira and OpenText Application Quality Management 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (42.9% of reviews)
Enterprise (66.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
starts at $20/ month for 10 users
No pricing available
Jira
Star Rating
(6,095)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (42.9% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
starts at $20/ month for 10 users
Browse all 3 pricing plansOpenText Application Quality Management
Star Rating
(133)4.0 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (66.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenText Application Quality ManagementSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Jira excels in its Test Diversity with a score of 9.3, allowing teams to manage various testing types effectively, while OpenText ALM Quality Center, although strong, does not match this level of versatility.
- Reviewers mention that Jira's Customization features, scoring 7.7, provide a flexible environment for tailoring workflows, whereas OpenText ALM Quality Center's customization options are perceived as more rigid, limiting user adaptability.
- G2 users highlight Jira's superior Bug Reporting capabilities, particularly in User Reports & Feedback with a score of 8.8, compared to OpenText ALM Quality Center's 8.2, indicating a more user-friendly experience in tracking and managing bugs.
- Reviewers say that Jira's Communication tools, such as its Wiki Documentation scoring 8.4, foster better collaboration among teams, while OpenText ALM Quality Center's communication features are seen as less integrated and effective.
- Users on G2 report that Jira's Workflow Management capabilities, particularly in Kanban Board functionality with a score of 8.8, provide a more visual and intuitive approach to task management compared to OpenText ALM Quality Center.
- Reviewers mention that Jira's Quality of Support is rated at 8.2, reflecting a more responsive and helpful support system, while OpenText ALM Quality Center's support, rated at 7.7, is viewed as less accessible and slower to respond to user inquiries.
Featured Products
Sponsored
Testiny
(12)
Automation Testing
Visit Website
Sponsored
Visure Requirements
(6)
Automation Testing
Visit Website
Sponsored
DocSheets
(1)
Automation Testing
Visit Website
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Jira
Development
starts at $20
/ month for 10 users
JIRA and JIRA Agile for issue tracking and development.
OpenText Application Quality Management
No pricing availableFree Trial
Jira
No trial information availableOpenText Application Quality Management
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.8
5,079
8.2
118
Ease of Use
8.0
5,110
7.9
118
Ease of Setup
7.6
1,476
7.2
61
Ease of Admin
7.4
1,270
7.2
59
Quality of Support
8.2
3,853
7.7
106
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.4
1,138
7.7
56
Product Direction (% positive)
8.2
4,916
6.8
116
Features by Category
Functionality
Not enough data
9.2
10
Not enough data
8.2
10
Not enough data
9.2
10
Management
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.8
10
Bug Reporting
8.8
1437
8.3
11
8.7
1397
9.2
12
8.8
1472
8.5
12
Bug Monitoring
8.6
1384
9.0
12
8.9
1480
9.2
12
8.8
1371
8.6
11
Functionality
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
7.7
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Automation
Not enough data
9.7
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Core Lifecycle Management - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Organization - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Communication
8.4
2272
Not enough data
8.2
2137
Not enough data
8.1
2051
Not enough data
Planning
8.7
2736
Not enough data
8.7
2812
Not enough data
8.8
2548
Not enough data
8.6
2654
Not enough data
8.3
2278
Not enough data
Workflow Management
8.6
2606
Not enough data
8.8
2856
Not enough data
7.8
1887
Not enough data
8.4
2118
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Communication
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Procedural
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Jira and OpenText Application Quality Management are categorized as Bug Tracking
Unique Categories
Jira is categorized as Product Management
OpenText Application Quality Management is categorized as Continuous Testing Platforms, Test Management, Requirements Management, ALM Software, Software Testing, Automation Testing, and AWS Marketplace
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Jira
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
OpenText Application Quality Management
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
23.6%
Computer Software
23.6%
Internet
4.8%
Financial Services
4.5%
Marketing and Advertising
4.3%
Other
39.2%
Information Technology and Services
36.8%
Computer Software
13.6%
Banking
6.4%
Hospital & Health Care
4.0%
Financial Services
4.0%
Other
35.2%
Most Helpful Reviews
Jira
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Daniel J.
Verified User in Computer & Network Security
We use JIRA extensively for issue management and tracking. Each team has a project and it is a great way to work amongst teams and collaborate. The tool is very versatile and great to have project leaders, watchers, stakeholders, etc. They also have...
Most Helpful Critical Review
Jerry W. E.
Verified User in Computer Software
Consider three pitfalls when adopting JIRA - two pertaining to administration teams and one pertaining to end-users. Admin Pitfall #1: while JIRA does in fact allow administrators the ability to build customized issue types, workflows and artifacts,...
OpenText Application Quality Management
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Krunal R.
Verified User in Consumer Electronics
It's the best tool for Quality Assurance - testing, defect tracking and management.
Most Helpful Critical Review
Verified User in Information Technology and Services
It's so slow that you have to walk away and come back after it loads!
Daniel J.
Verified User in Computer & Network Security
We use JIRA extensively for issue management and tracking. Each team has a project and it is a great way to work amongst teams and collaborate. The tool is very versatile and great to have project leaders, watchers, stakeholders, etc. They also have...
Krunal R.
Verified User in Consumer Electronics
It's the best tool for Quality Assurance - testing, defect tracking and management.
Jerry W. E.
Verified User in Computer Software
Consider three pitfalls when adopting JIRA - two pertaining to administration teams and one pertaining to end-users. Admin Pitfall #1: while JIRA does in fact allow administrators the ability to build customized issue types, workflows and artifacts,...
Verified User in Information Technology and Services
It's so slow that you have to walk away and come back after it loads!
Discussions
Is Jira a good tool?
12 comments
MP
Yes, It's very useful, Just start on it and give some time on that.Read more
What are the features of JIRA?
11 comments
CS
Allows you to setup your project as your team/company flows thru the agile process. You can see what is next in the sprint, where others are, enter your...Read more
How is Jira transforming project management practices in agile software development teams?
6 comments
VC
teams plan sprints, manage backlogsRead more
How compatible is this software in integrating it with non micro focus applications?
2 comments
PK
This app originally named as Test director was developed by Mercury over 15 years ago. Then the it was renamed to Quality center and new owner became...Read more
OpenText Application Quality Management has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 2.5 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
or continue with
Gmail.com addresses not permitted. A business domain using Google is allowed.
By proceeding, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
