Users report that IrisVR Prospect excels in ease of use with a score of 9.4, making it a preferred choice for small businesses looking for a straightforward VR solution, while The Wild, with a score of 8.9, is noted for its slightly steeper learning curve.
Reviewers mention that The Wild offers superior quality of support, scoring 9.8 compared to IrisVR Prospect's 9.0, indicating that users feel more supported and valued when using The Wild.
G2 users highlight that IrisVR Prospect's dynamic updating feature scores an impressive 9.2, allowing for real-time changes during presentations, whereas The Wild does not have a comparable feature that stands out in user reviews.
Users on G2 report that The Wild shines in collaboration features, with multiple users scoring 9.6, which facilitates teamwork effectively, while IrisVR Prospect, although strong, scores slightly lower at 9.5.
Reviewers mention that IrisVR Prospect's avatar creation feature scores only 4.4, which is a significant drawback for users looking for customizable avatars, while The Wild does not have this limitation, focusing more on environmental and hardware capabilities.
Users say that both products integrate well with BIM, scoring 9.2, but The Wild's 3D rendering integration is notably lower at 5.8, which may affect users who prioritize high-quality visual outputs in their projects.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
IrisVR Prospect
No pricing available
The Wild
Basic
$295/mo.
3 concurrent logins
3 floating licenses;
2GB of file uploads per month
What is your preferred tool and workflows for prepping components and individual elements or models to be used in a space inside The Wild?
1 Comment
AH
We are just getting started in The Wild - our company uses Revit to model a project's curtainwall for shop drawings, fabrication and installation. The first...Read more
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.