Compare Immersive Labs and Security Journey 
- Users report that Security Journey excels in its "Ease of Setup" with a score of 9.5, while Immersive Labs follows closely with a score of 9.7, indicating both platforms are user-friendly but Immersive Labs has a slight edge in initial configuration.
- Reviewers mention that Security Journey's "Quality of Support" is rated at 9.3, which is significantly higher than Immersive Labs' 8.4, suggesting that users may find more reliable assistance and guidance with Security Journey.
- G2 users highlight that Immersive Labs offers superior "Continuous Assessment" and "Phishing Assessment" features, both rated at 10.0, indicating a strong focus on ongoing evaluation and security awareness training, which is crucial for cybersecurity professionals.
- Users on G2 appreciate Security Journey's "Learning Paths" with a score of 9.3, which helps in structured learning, while Immersive Labs also performs well in this area but does not surpass Security Journey's rating.
- Reviewers say that Immersive Labs shines in "Gamification" with a score of 9.2, enhancing user engagement through interactive elements, while Security Journey's score of 8.7 indicates it may not be as effective in this area.
- Users report that both platforms offer strong "Customization" options, with Security Journey scoring 8.5 and Immersive Labs slightly higher at 8.7, suggesting that users can tailor their learning experiences effectively on both platforms.
The most helpful aspect of immersive labs is the practical labs that come with each lab. Supplementing reading with some practical work where you can apply the knowledge and skills learned dramatically improves knowledge retention.
Some of the more challenging labs are incredibly frustrating with the limited interacts you can do in the VM and working in a smaller/laggier screen. I don't understand how some of the estimated times are calculated, I'm still relatively new to the security...
The training content is thorough and easily understandable. The inclusion of problems makes the learning process enjoyable. My experience, with the Security Journey has been positive and valuable.
Poorly worded and confusing questions in "assessment" sections Extremely buggy UI - it felt like we were beta testers. Many individuals in our org had trouble progressing through the course due to basic UI bugs, e.g. the "finish" button on modules not...
The most helpful aspect of immersive labs is the practical labs that come with each lab. Supplementing reading with some practical work where you can apply the knowledge and skills learned dramatically improves knowledge retention.
The training content is thorough and easily understandable. The inclusion of problems makes the learning process enjoyable. My experience, with the Security Journey has been positive and valuable.
Some of the more challenging labs are incredibly frustrating with the limited interacts you can do in the VM and working in a smaller/laggier screen. I don't understand how some of the estimated times are calculated, I'm still relatively new to the security...
Poorly worded and confusing questions in "assessment" sections Extremely buggy UI - it felt like we were beta testers. Many individuals in our org had trouble progressing through the course due to basic UI bugs, e.g. the "finish" button on modules not...
