- Home
- ...
- Software Testing Tools
- IBM Engineering Test Management
- TestRail
- IBM Engineering Test Management-vs-TestRail
Compare IBM Engineering Test Management and TestRail 
- Users report that IBM Engineering Test Management excels in its Test Repository functionality, scoring 8.9, which allows for efficient organization and management of test cases, while TestRail, although strong, does not provide the same level of depth in this area.
- Reviewers mention that IBM Engineering Test Management has a higher score in Ease of Setup at 9.0 compared to TestRail's 8.5, indicating that users find it easier to get started with IBM's solution.
- G2 users highlight that TestRail shines in Ease of Use with a score of 8.6, making it more user-friendly for teams that prioritize a straightforward interface, whereas IBM Engineering Test Management scores lower at 7.2.
- Users on G2 report that IBM Engineering Test Management's Quality of Support is rated at 7.5, which some find lacking compared to TestRail's 8.4, suggesting that TestRail may offer more responsive and helpful customer service.
- Reviewers mention that TestRail's Product Direction score of 8.5 indicates a more positive outlook on future updates and features, while IBM Engineering Test Management's score of 6.1 raises concerns about its long-term viability and innovation.
- Users say that IBM Engineering Test Management's Integration capabilities, scoring 7.9, may not be as robust as TestRail's, which is often praised for its seamless integration with various tools, enhancing overall workflow efficiency.
- Free trial with no commitment and no credit card
- No IT required, get started in minutes
- Automated updates & optimizations
- Secure hosting on super-fast servers
What I liked the best is that you can manage your entire testing process directly within the tool. It gives you the capability to write your entire test plan, test cases, test scripts and import requirements from ReqPro all within the tool.
The interface is frustrating: it bounces around as one makes entries, there are side panes that slide around until you figure out how to pin them, if you can. Navigation can be idiosyncratic from screen to screen, sometimes requiring one to place one's...
I am experienced in a number of test management tools including HP ALM/Quality Center, IBM's Rational ClearQuest, SmartBear's QA Complete, among others. I am now one of the owners of a small professional services group, and I have management...
I don't like that once you close a ticket in Jira the status of the ticket reads closed in TestRail, yet Testrail still shows that issue as either needing to have a test run on it to pass or fail. If its closed its closed, and no longer needs tests to run.
What I liked the best is that you can manage your entire testing process directly within the tool. It gives you the capability to write your entire test plan, test cases, test scripts and import requirements from ReqPro all within the tool.
I am experienced in a number of test management tools including HP ALM/Quality Center, IBM's Rational ClearQuest, SmartBear's QA Complete, among others. I am now one of the owners of a small professional services group, and I have management...
The interface is frustrating: it bounces around as one makes entries, there are side panes that slide around until you figure out how to pin them, if you can. Navigation can be idiosyncratic from screen to screen, sometimes requiring one to place one's...
I don't like that once you close a ticket in Jira the status of the ticket reads closed in TestRail, yet Testrail still shows that issue as either needing to have a test run on it to pass or fail. If its closed its closed, and no longer needs tests to run.
