- Home
- ...
- ALM Software
- codebeamer
- IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next
- codebeamer-vs-IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next
Compare IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next and codebeamer 
- Users report that codebeamer excels in ease of use with a score of 8.0, while IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next lags behind at 7.4. Reviewers mention that codebeamer's intuitive interface makes it easier for teams to adopt and utilize the software effectively.
- Reviewers mention that IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next shines in centralized information management, scoring 9.3 compared to codebeamer's 8.8. Users on G2 highlight the robust capabilities of DOORS Next in managing complex requirements across large projects.
- G2 users report that codebeamer offers superior stakeholder communication with a score of 7.8, while DOORS Next scores higher at 8.6. Users say that DOORS Next provides better tools for engaging stakeholders, which is crucial for large enterprise projects.
- Users say that codebeamer's automated creation and testing feature, scoring 7.6, is less robust than IBM's offering, which scores 8.7. Reviewers mention that DOORS Next's automation capabilities significantly enhance testing efficiency and reduce manual errors.
- Reviewers mention that codebeamer's traceability feature scores 8.7, while DOORS Next leads with 9.2. Users report that DOORS Next provides more comprehensive traceability options, which are essential for compliance in regulated industries.
- Users on G2 highlight that codebeamer's planning tools, such as work capacity and task ranking, score well at 8.6, but DOORS Next's planning features are perceived as more advanced, particularly in release forecasting, where it scores 8.3 compared to codebeamer's 8.3.
- 45-day trial with no commitment and no credit card
DOORS is easy to understand and work with. This makes it one of the best requirements management tool. DOORS is quick and very effective and best suited for automotive industry
As much as you populate DOORS with artifacts, after a period of time, could be difficult you find what information you are looking for. Depending how the Project Areas are organized in your Company, navegability can be tiring. For example: - When you want...
I must say that what I like best about codebeamer is its comprehensive approach to application lifecycle management. It's great how it covers everything from requirements management to testing and quality assurance, all in one platform. It's also quite...
Lacking user-friendly documentation and unintuitive UI leading to slow adoption rates. Missing key functionalities for Planning and Reporting (e.g. historical data). Unresponsive and limited support with an intransparent organization making it unclear how...
DOORS is easy to understand and work with. This makes it one of the best requirements management tool. DOORS is quick and very effective and best suited for automotive industry
I must say that what I like best about codebeamer is its comprehensive approach to application lifecycle management. It's great how it covers everything from requirements management to testing and quality assurance, all in one platform. It's also quite...
As much as you populate DOORS with artifacts, after a period of time, could be difficult you find what information you are looking for. Depending how the Project Areas are organized in your Company, navegability can be tiring. For example: - When you want...
Lacking user-friendly documentation and unintuitive UI leading to slow adoption rates. Missing key functionalities for Planning and Reporting (e.g. historical data). Unresponsive and limited support with an intransparent organization making it unclear how...
