Compare HyperSnap and ShareX 
I like how HyperSnap is very organized and also fast and very convenient when needing to take some quick screenshots of important documentation.
An important feature which is not involved in this tool is that it doesn't allow to capture video of the screen. Another area of improvement is the user interface of the tool which looks quite old and could be improved.
ShareX is an easy-to-use and fully functioning screen-grabbing software, but it does much more. I use it mainly for capturing images of screens that I then insert into emails, presentations, and other projects. I also use the color picker in the tools menu...
Off the top of my head I can't really think of any real flaws in it, I use it very constantly day to day, and I don't think I've ever ran into any problems with it at all. I suppose one thing that could be improved is the preferences and configuration...
I like how HyperSnap is very organized and also fast and very convenient when needing to take some quick screenshots of important documentation.
ShareX is an easy-to-use and fully functioning screen-grabbing software, but it does much more. I use it mainly for capturing images of screens that I then insert into emails, presentations, and other projects. I also use the color picker in the tools menu...
An important feature which is not involved in this tool is that it doesn't allow to capture video of the screen. Another area of improvement is the user interface of the tool which looks quite old and could be improved.
Off the top of my head I can't really think of any real flaws in it, I use it very constantly day to day, and I don't think I've ever ran into any problems with it at all. I suppose one thing that could be improved is the preferences and configuration...
