- Home
- ...
- ALM Software
- Helix ALM
- IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next
- Helix ALM-vs-IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next
Compare Helix ALM and IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next 
- Users report that Helix ALM excels in Requirements Listing with a score of 9.3, indicating a robust capability to manage and organize requirements effectively, while IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next follows closely with a score of 8.9, which some users feel could be improved for better clarity.
- Reviewers mention that Helix ALM's Quality of Support is notably high at 8.7, with many users appreciating the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team, whereas IBM DOORS Next has a lower score of 7.7, leading some users to express concerns about the timeliness of support responses.
- G2 users highlight that Helix ALM offers superior Ease of Setup with a score of 7.2, making it more user-friendly for new teams, while IBM DOORS Next's score of 6.2 suggests a steeper learning curve that some users find challenging.
- Users on G2 report that both products have strong Traceability features, but IBM DOORS Next shines with a score of 9.2, which users say provides more comprehensive tracking of requirements changes compared to Helix ALM's score of 8.8.
- Reviewers mention that Helix ALM's Internal Communication Enablement is rated at 8.6, which users find beneficial for team collaboration, while IBM DOORS Next scores slightly higher at 8.7, indicating a slight edge in facilitating communication among team members.
- Users say that Helix ALM's Automated Creation & Testing feature, with a score of 8.6, is praised for its efficiency in streamlining testing processes, while IBM DOORS Next, with a score of 8.7, is noted for its advanced automation capabilities that some users find particularly valuable in large-scale projects.
- 45-day trial with no commitment and no credit card
The searching functionality is very strong in TestTrack. I almost never have any issues searching through our large set of tickets. With some combination of filters and keywords I can almost always find what I'm looking for.
Cannot fully customize the layout to a project's needs. P1/S1 issues cannot be highlithed in a red color. Liscences are expensives and not ideal for small/independant companies. It's sadly not mobile friendly yet. It's bad for bugs reporting and it...
DOORS is easy to understand and work with. This makes it one of the best requirements management tool. DOORS is quick and very effective and best suited for automotive industry
As much as you populate DOORS with artifacts, after a period of time, could be difficult you find what information you are looking for. Depending how the Project Areas are organized in your Company, navegability can be tiring. For example: - When you want...
The searching functionality is very strong in TestTrack. I almost never have any issues searching through our large set of tickets. With some combination of filters and keywords I can almost always find what I'm looking for.
DOORS is easy to understand and work with. This makes it one of the best requirements management tool. DOORS is quick and very effective and best suited for automotive industry
Cannot fully customize the layout to a project's needs. P1/S1 issues cannot be highlithed in a red color. Liscences are expensives and not ideal for small/independant companies. It's sadly not mobile friendly yet. It's bad for bugs reporting and it...
As much as you populate DOORS with artifacts, after a period of time, could be difficult you find what information you are looking for. Depending how the Project Areas are organized in your Company, navegability can be tiring. For example: - When you want...
