Compare Google Cloud Build and Jenkins 
- Users report that Jenkins has a robust integration capability with a rating of 9.2, allowing seamless connections with various tools, while Google Cloud Build shines even brighter with a rating of 9.3, making it easier to integrate with Google services and other cloud-based tools.
- Reviewers mention that Jenkins offers extensive extensibility with a score of 8.6, but Google Cloud Build slightly edges out with a score of 8.9, providing a more user-friendly experience for customizing builds and workflows.
- G2 users highlight that Jenkins has a solid automation feature with a rating of 9.2, but Google Cloud Build excels with a score of 9.3, particularly in automating deployment processes, which users find significantly enhances their productivity.
- Users on G2 report that Jenkins has a decent configuration management score of 8.9, but Google Cloud Build's management processes and workflow score of 9.4 indicates a more streamlined and efficient approach to managing CI/CD pipelines.
- Reviewers say that Jenkins has a quality of support rating of 7.8, which some users find lacking, whereas Google Cloud Build's support rating of 8.6 is noted for being more responsive and helpful, enhancing the overall user experience.
- Users mention that while Jenkins has a pipeline control score of 8.9, Google Cloud Build's continuous deployment score of 9.1 reflects its superior capability in managing and executing deployment pipelines effectively.
Mainly I observed it has affordable pricing that offers an enterprise suite to monitor and manage the data and automatically build the source codes (CI) part and deploy the applications Coming to the orchestration perspective the microservices business...
the landscape of CI/CD tools is dynamic, and service providers frequently update and enhance their offerings. it will not cause any dislike
The ease of setup and configuration of new builds. I love the ability to copy builds to create new ones.
Markup. All the configuration is stored in XML, which imho is overkill for what Jenkins does. It also makes version control awkward. I really wish I could use git to keep track of versions of jobs and also as deployment method. Linux sys admins tend to live...
Mainly I observed it has affordable pricing that offers an enterprise suite to monitor and manage the data and automatically build the source codes (CI) part and deploy the applications Coming to the orchestration perspective the microservices business...
The ease of setup and configuration of new builds. I love the ability to copy builds to create new ones.
the landscape of CI/CD tools is dynamic, and service providers frequently update and enhance their offerings. it will not cause any dislike
Markup. All the configuration is stored in XML, which imho is overkill for what Jenkins does. It also makes version control awkward. I really wish I could use git to keep track of versions of jobs and also as deployment method. Linux sys admins tend to live...
