Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now

Compare GNU Octave and IBM SPSS Statistics

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
GNU Octave
GNU Octave
Star Rating
(55)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (66.0% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about GNU Octave
IBM SPSS Statistics
IBM SPSS Statistics
Star Rating
(916)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (43.2% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Starting at $99.00 1 User Per Month
Free Trial is available
Browse all 4 pricing plans
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • Users report that IBM SPSS Statistics excels in its ANOVA Support with a score of 9.0, which reviewers mention is particularly beneficial for complex statistical analysis, while GNU Octave's support is slightly lower at 8.8, indicating it may not be as robust for users focused on this methodology.
  • Reviewers mention that GNU Octave shines in Data Visualization, scoring 8.9, which users say provides a more intuitive experience for creating visual representations of data compared to IBM SPSS Statistics, which has a lower score of 7.8 in this area.
  • G2 users highlight that IBM SPSS Statistics offers superior Regression capabilities with a score of 9.1, making it a preferred choice for users needing advanced predictive analytics, whereas GNU Octave's score of 8.3 suggests it may lack some advanced features.
  • Users on G2 report that the Quality of Support for GNU Octave is rated higher at 8.2 compared to IBM SPSS Statistics' 7.6, indicating that users may find more responsive and helpful support when using GNU Octave.
  • Reviewers mention that IBM SPSS Statistics has a more comprehensive Cost Analysis feature, scoring 8.2, which users say is essential for financial modeling, while GNU Octave's score of 8.5 suggests it may offer better tools for users focused on cost-related analytics.
  • Users say that the Ease of Use for GNU Octave is rated higher at 8.4 compared to IBM SPSS Statistics' 7.9, indicating that new users may find GNU Octave more accessible and user-friendly for statistical computing tasks.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
GNU Octave
No pricing available
IBM SPSS Statistics
Base Subscription: Monthly auto-renewal - Buy online
Starting at $99.00
1 User Per Month
Browse all 4 pricing plans
Free Trial
GNU Octave
No trial information available
IBM SPSS Statistics
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.3
43
8.5
779
Ease of Use
8.4
43
7.9
783
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
7.9
172
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
7.6
134
Quality of Support
8.2
39
7.6
589
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
8.0
128
Product Direction (% positive)
7.7
41
6.5
755
Features by Category
8.4
21
8.5
243
Administration
8.4
17
8.4
185
8.2
20
8.7
201
8.0
18
Feature Not Available
Capabilities
8.9
20
7.8
219
8.0
18
8.4
182
8.1
17
8.1
165
8.5
16
8.2
162
Methodology
8.8
13
9.0
201
8.3
19
9.1
214
8.3
16
8.8
186
Generative AI
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
8.5
13
Not enough data
Design
9.5
10
Not enough data
8.3
11
Not enough data
8.2
10
Not enough data
8.2
10
Not enough data
Tools
8.5
11
Not enough data
8.3
11
Not enough data
8.2
10
Not enough data
Work
9.0
10
Not enough data
7.9
11
Not enough data
8.2
11
Not enough data
8.8
11
Not enough data
8.0
11
Not enough data
Environment
8.7
10
Not enough data
8.5
11
Not enough data
8.3
10
Not enough data
9.0
10
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.1
334
Statistical Tool
Not enough data
7.2
204
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
7.7
208
Data Analysis
Not enough data
8.9
320
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Decision Making
Not enough data
7.6
245
Not enough data
7.0
298
Not enough data
7.4
266
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
GNU Octave
GNU Octave
IBM SPSS Statistics
IBM SPSS Statistics
GNU Octave and IBM SPSS Statistics are categorized as Statistical Analysis
Unique Categories
GNU Octave
GNU Octave is categorized as Simulation & CAE
IBM SPSS Statistics
IBM SPSS Statistics is categorized as Predictive Analytics
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
GNU Octave
GNU Octave
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
66.0%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
17.0%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
17.0%
IBM SPSS Statistics
IBM SPSS Statistics
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
27.5%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
29.3%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
43.2%
Reviewers' Industry
GNU Octave
GNU Octave
Research
11.3%
Computer Software
11.3%
Information Technology and Services
5.7%
Higher Education
5.7%
Food Production
5.7%
Other
60.4%
IBM SPSS Statistics
IBM SPSS Statistics
Higher Education
26.6%
Research
16.6%
Market Research
7.5%
Education Management
7.5%
Hospital & Health Care
6.6%
Other
35.2%
Alternatives
GNU Octave
GNU Octave Alternatives
Scilab
Scilab
Add Scilab
MATLAB
MATLAB
Add MATLAB
Posit
Posit
Add Posit
Simulink
Simulink
Add Simulink
IBM SPSS Statistics
IBM SPSS Statistics Alternatives
Minitab Statistical Software
Minitab Statistical Software
Add Minitab Statistical Software
JMP
JMP
Add JMP
KNIME Software
KNIME Software
Add KNIME Software
Qualtrics Strategy & Research
Qualtrics Strategy & Research
Add Qualtrics Strategy & Research
Discussions
GNU Octave
GNU Octave Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
GNU Octave has no discussions with answers
IBM SPSS Statistics
IBM SPSS Statistics Discussions
Classes?
4 Comments
Verified User
G2
Dear Diego. That is right. SPSS is a complex software. Firstly, I recoomend you think about what do you need to do with it. For example, it is very differnt...Read more
Is there a user guide from IBM for SPSS?
2 Comments
Aimee F.
AF
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLVMB_26.0.0/statistics_kc_ddita/spss/product_landing.htmlRead more
Is there possibility that IBM SPSS can be incoperated with other plugins.
2 Comments
Greg T.
GT
I know that SPSS has an R integration which can use several routines from R.Read more