Compare Git and OpenText AccuRev 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (36.1% of reviews)
Enterprise (55.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Git
Star Rating
(488)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (36.1% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about GitOpenText AccuRev
Star Rating
(20)3.8 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (55.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenText AccuRevSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that OpenText AccuRev's "streaming" feature allows for efficient management of code changes, but reviewers mention that it can be complex to set up compared to Git's more straightforward branching model.
- Reviewers mention that Git's "distributed version control" system provides greater flexibility for teams working remotely, while users say that OpenText AccuRev's centralized approach can lead to better control in enterprise environments.
- G2 users highlight that Git's "merge conflict resolution" tools are more intuitive and user-friendly, whereas users report that OpenText AccuRev's tools can be less accessible for new users, impacting ease of use ratings.
- Reviewers say that OpenText AccuRev's "change package" feature is beneficial for tracking changes in large projects, but users on G2 note that it lacks the community support and extensive documentation that Git offers.
- Users report that Git's integration with various CI/CD tools is seamless, enhancing its usability in modern development workflows, while reviewers mention that OpenText AccuRev's integrations are more limited, which can hinder its adaptability.
- Reviewers mention that the quality of support for Git is generally higher, with users on G2 praising the active community and resources available, while users say that OpenText AccuRev's support can be slower and less responsive, affecting overall satisfaction.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Git
No pricing availableOpenText AccuRev
No pricing availableFree Trial
Git
No trial information availableOpenText AccuRev
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.4
420
8.1
20
Ease of Use
8.1
421
7.5
20
Ease of Setup
8.8
88
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
8.1
66
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.6
336
7.8
15
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.6
51
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
9.0
409
5.3
20
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Git and OpenText AccuRev are categorized as Version Control Software
Unique Categories
Git has no unique categories
OpenText AccuRev is categorized as Configuration Management and Version Control Clients
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Git
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
OpenText AccuRev
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
33.6%
Information Technology and Services
20.0%
Internet
9.2%
Marketing and Advertising
4.0%
Education Management
2.9%
Other
30.3%
Semiconductors
40.0%
Computer Software
15.0%
Information Technology and Services
10.0%
Computer Hardware
10.0%
Higher Education
5.0%
Other
20.0%
Most Helpful Reviews
Git
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Vasundhara G.
Verified User in Computer & Network Security
The way they structure and record each code
Most Helpful Critical Review
Andrei D.
Verified User in Internet
Poor design decisions led to leaking abstractions: * Design decision: "do not record changes, just store snapshots of working copy". Following that leaves no way but to detect file copying/renaming (using their contents' hashes). It is fine until user...
OpenText AccuRev
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Verified User in Semiconductors
Ability to effectively track versions and changes, Ability to use 3rd party comparison tools for Diff and Merge
Most Helpful Critical Review
Verified User in Higher Education
Not super user friendly - takes training to use
Vasundhara G.
Verified User in Computer & Network Security
The way they structure and record each code
Verified User in Semiconductors
Ability to effectively track versions and changes, Ability to use 3rd party comparison tools for Diff and Merge
Andrei D.
Verified User in Internet
Poor design decisions led to leaking abstractions: * Design decision: "do not record changes, just store snapshots of working copy". Following that leaves no way but to detect file copying/renaming (using their contents' hashes). It is fine until user...
Verified User in Higher Education
Not super user friendly - takes training to use
Alternatives
Discussions
What is Git used for?
3 comments
TG
Version Control of your codebase and repositories.Read more
what is the most channeling use of Git in your experience
2 comments
CA
The most use I have found for it is effectively communicating with a repository. I use it to merge over new code. Read more
OpenText AccuRev has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 2.5 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
or continue with
Gmail.com addresses not permitted. A business domain using Google is allowed.
By proceeding, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
