Top Rated OpenText AccuRev Alternatives
20 OpenText AccuRev Reviews
Easy to use and maintain and configure. Visual representation of branches is nice. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The error code and descriptions are hard to figure out. Sometimes the reconciliation of conflicts is buggy. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
AccuRev supports multiple streams which means you can develop features for different clients in parallel. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
In general the speed of AccuRev is a bit slow comparing with Git. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Works on multiple platforms, Windows, Linux, CentOS. Users can have workspaces on several development machines at the same time. Non-changeable, immutable data store, perfect for compliance requirements ISO and similar. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Perl script for changes to system parameters. If you do not have an in-house Perl Script staff member, it is a real process to work with AccuRev to make simple changes in the system. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Accurev does a great job and keeping track of changes, allowing you to keep, and revert easily. Overall, just an easy way to track changes, and maintain versions of your business code. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
I really do not like the interface, maybe that is the best that can be done, but it seems clunky, and often the wording on the options is confusing. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Has good flexibility and friendly UI design. It is simple and easy to use. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Cost is high
Slow to use
Search option is hard to use. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
UI is very user-friendly.
The ability to keep track of streams and modified files easily and quickly.
Easy to update and commnt Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The GUI to search for past file updates is hard to use and the cost is high Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The ease of using Accurev. I have used SVN and Accurev and feel that for most of the tasks Accurev is simple to use without much learning curve. Espicially for revision control going between version and updating the work space, Merging code is very simple on Accurev.
One of the most convenient features of Accurev is creating new branches from a main branch.
The other feature, I like the most is the visual representation of all the code branches showing where each branch has originated from. This gives a very good idea of relationship between different branches. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Just iOS (of smartphones), the 'not so commonly used' operations are difficult to access. For example, Blame of SVN (that shows revision number and author of each line) is done better than that in Accurev.
While browsing all the branches and searching for branches, I feel that Accurev is littler slower. This is not to say its competition SVN is faster. I just feel that Accurev could step up the game by speeding up browsing different code branches. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
It works well enough for version control to store old versions, review differences between versions, and promote files when they're ready for the next level.
The command line interface is powerful and makes it easy to script and automate tasks. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
It's different from other version control systems with different terminologies, so there is a steep learning curve for new users.
It's fairly slow to do a lot of things, sometimes several minutes. When I am updating a workspace I usually switch to another program and switch back later so I don't have to wait. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
