Compare GeneXus and OutSystems 
- Users report that OutSystems excels in "Ease of Use" with a score of 9.2, while GeneXus trails slightly behind at 8.6. Reviewers mention that OutSystems' intuitive interface significantly reduces the learning curve for new users.
- Reviewers say that OutSystems offers superior "Straight-Out-the-Box Functionality" with a score of 8.7 compared to GeneXus's 7.6. Users highlight that OutSystems provides a more comprehensive set of pre-built templates and components, making it easier to get started quickly.
- G2 users note that GeneXus shines in "Data Security," achieving a score of 9.1, while OutSystems scores 8.6. Reviewers mention that GeneXus has robust security features that are particularly appealing for businesses handling sensitive data.
- Users on G2 report that OutSystems has a slight edge in "Application Deployment" with a score of 9.1, compared to GeneXus's 9.0. Reviewers say that OutSystems' deployment process is streamlined and user-friendly, allowing for faster go-to-market strategies.
- Reviewers mention that GeneXus performs better in "Data Migration," scoring 8.2 against OutSystems' 7.8. Users report that GeneXus provides more flexible options for migrating existing data, which is crucial for businesses transitioning from legacy systems.
- Users say that both platforms offer solid "Help Guides," but OutSystems scores higher at 8.6 compared to GeneXus's 7.2. Reviewers highlight that OutSystems' documentation is more comprehensive and easier to navigate, which aids in troubleshooting and learning.
- Integrated Development Environment (IDE) for creating your apps
- Free Online Training
- Community Support
Our teams ability to develop large scale enterprise applications with a small team. The ability to rapidly prototype, deploy in multiple languages and easily handle application enhancements and maintenance. Focusing on functionality, end-user business...
What I do not like is that its simplicity can also be its weakness, since it does not support everything, that is to say that the customization is very restrictive due to the typecasting of some parts of the generator and if there are very complex genexus...
The intuitiveness of the IDE is very good and new developers can easily catch on. I also like the cost of change that is very low - this is important in industries where change is at the order of the day.
System integrator and or customer needs to know their proprietary language and the pricing is not very feasible. it doesn't come with any enterprise integration apdotor and customer or SI needs to build their own instead.
Our teams ability to develop large scale enterprise applications with a small team. The ability to rapidly prototype, deploy in multiple languages and easily handle application enhancements and maintenance. Focusing on functionality, end-user business...
The intuitiveness of the IDE is very good and new developers can easily catch on. I also like the cost of change that is very low - this is important in industries where change is at the order of the day.
What I do not like is that its simplicity can also be its weakness, since it does not support everything, that is to say that the customization is very restrictive due to the typecasting of some parts of the generator and if there are very complex genexus...
System integrator and or customer needs to know their proprietary language and the pricing is not very feasible. it doesn't come with any enterprise integration apdotor and customer or SI needs to build their own instead.
